Pujols Signs With Angels

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38606
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by sighyoung »

heyzeus wrote:
sighyoung wrote:
AdmiralKird wrote:So the Cardinals set a benchmark, other teams were informed of that mark, then the Cardinals were not allowed to counter?

Either way, ESPN should get the truth and shoot a two hour movie of the entire contract saga in the past few days in lei of not being able to televise an announcement press conference. It would be way more entertaining.

6,000th post.
Better yet, hire David Mamet, so that Lozano and Mozeliak say variations of "[expletive] you!" for two hours.
First prize is Albert Pujols. Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you're fired.
Lozano's motto on contracts is "Always Be Clausing."

User avatar
Donnie Ebert
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6646
Joined: June 15 06, 9:11 am
Location: Reading The Boat Rocker by Terence Mann

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by Donnie Ebert »

cards2468 wrote:
Sadly I agree with the article. Can we finally admit that he's a dick?
Here's essentially the same article from March:

http://www.jeffpearlman.com/albert-pujo ... of-people/

Award-winning cut and paste writing.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by cardsfansince82 »

Image

Albert Earp: I did my duty, now I'd like to get on with my life. I'm going to Anaheim.
Stan: Ah, I see. To strike it rich. Well, all right, that's fine. Tell you one thing, though...I never saw a rich man who didn't wind up with a guilty conscience.
Albert Earp: Already got a guilty conscience. Might as well have the money, too. Good day, mang.

/fin
//the black hat should have been a clue

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by TimeForGuinness »

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-ang ... 2777.story

I guess we know where all the money came from...

User avatar
cards2468
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 14745
Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by cards2468 »

Image
*vomit*

User avatar
obucard
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8177
Joined: April 18 06, 11:04 pm
Location: Central AR

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by obucard »

cards2468 wrote:Image
*vomit*
$10 says he'll share your reaction by 2016.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30811
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by ghostrunner »

For some reason I'm annoyed by the teeny little stripes on the Angels sleeves and neck.

User avatar
cards2468
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 14745
Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by cards2468 »

obucard wrote:
cards2468 wrote:Image
*vomit*
$10 says he'll share your reaction by 2016.
My guess is by 2016 he'll be walking out of the stadium with the same [expletive] smirk on his face carrying jerseys of Jason Heyward or Buster Posey or whomever they decide to blow their tv contract money on.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by JL21 »

I have to say, of all the places he could end up, Anaheim is just about the best case scenario. It'd suck to see him with any other NL team, especially the Cubs. I wouldn't want him in Boston because the city of St. Louis would never stop whining about it. Seeing him as a Yankee would make me want to vomit. But the Angels have traditionally been a fun team to watch with players you can pull for during the Scioscia years.

User avatar
cards2468
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 14745
Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Post by cards2468 »

JL21 wrote:I have to say, of all the places he could end up, Anaheim is just about the best case scenario. It'd suck to see him with any other NL team, especially the Cubs. I wouldn't want him in Boston because the city of St. Louis would never stop whining about it. Seeing him as a Yankee would make me want to vomit. But the Angels have traditionally been a fun team to watch with players you can pull for during the Scioscia years.
Yea, too bad they have to be in LA.

Locked