Seattle looking at Craig

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Fat Strat »

Don't forget that Felix is going to make $20M for the next two years. That's a ton of money and should hinder his trade value a lot. Not a lot of teams can take on $40M in guaranteed payroll while giving up multiple prospects.

Pudgelewis
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7200
Joined: May 23 12, 2:26 am
Location: Kentucky

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Pudgelewis »

Felix The Cat wrote:
cpebbles wrote:
Pudgelewis wrote:Like some others have said, SP hasn't been our problem.
It's going to be. Kelly hasn't been pitching anything like his ERA, and the only pitcher we can realistically hope will match his performance from this point on is Wainwright.
I think the larger point is that getting an upgrade in the rotation to protect against Kelly's eventual regression won't make the team perform necessarily better than it is right now. Even if a Felix Hernandez comes in to match Kelly's sparkling ERA with the peripherals to boot, it doesn't matter much when the offense is doing it Jekkyl and Hyde routine. So giving up a cost controlled player who is likely our 2013 starting 1B for that kind of upgrade probably isn't the best idea.
Much better said than I did, but that's my line of thinking.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

Fat Strat wrote:Don't forget that Felix is going to make $20M for the next two years. That's a ton of money and should hinder his trade value a lot. Not a lot of teams can take on $40M in guaranteed payroll while giving up multiple prospects.
Considering that teams are lining up in free agency or near free agency to give 20 million per to guys not as good as Felix(Hamels, Cain, Darvish), I really doubt his market is limited by his contract. Would it be the most efficient(air quotes on efficient?) use of resources? Probably not, but a 26 year old proven 6 WAR pitcher is maybe the most rare thing in baseball. It can't be replicated in the way that Allen Craig can, or that a litany of prospects can, or even dollars spent in free agency can.

User avatar
Mary1966
President of the Ponson Fan Club
Posts: 10766
Joined: April 18 06, 10:56 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Mary1966 »

If Zduriencik traded Felix he would be dead in Seattle. Felix is the only reason left to watch the Mariners.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Vidor »

So let me pose my question again. Who would we get?

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21898
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Socnorb11 »

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Don't forget that Felix is going to make $20M for the next two years. That's a ton of money and should hinder his trade value a lot. Not a lot of teams can take on $40M in guaranteed payroll while giving up multiple prospects.
Considering that teams are lining up in free agency or near free agency to give 20 million per to guys not as good as Felix(Hamels, Cain, Darvish), I really doubt his market is limited by his contract. Would it be the most efficient(air quotes on efficient?) use of resources? Probably not, but a 26 year old proven 6 WAR pitcher is maybe the most rare thing in baseball. It can't be replicated in the way that Allen Craig can, or that a litany of prospects can, or even dollars spent in free agency can.

+++

I think it would be insane to make Allen Craig a deal-breaker in a Felix Hernandez trade.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18018
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Magneto2.0 »

Socnorb11 wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Don't forget that Felix is going to make $20M for the next two years. That's a ton of money and should hinder his trade value a lot. Not a lot of teams can take on $40M in guaranteed payroll while giving up multiple prospects.
Considering that teams are lining up in free agency or near free agency to give 20 million per to guys not as good as Felix(Hamels, Cain, Darvish), I really doubt his market is limited by his contract. Would it be the most efficient(air quotes on efficient?) use of resources? Probably not, but a 26 year old proven 6 WAR pitcher is maybe the most rare thing in baseball. It can't be replicated in the way that Allen Craig can, or that a litany of prospects can, or even dollars spent in free agency can.

+++

I think it would be insane to make Allen Craig a deal-breaker in a Felix Hernandez trade.
This. I love Allen Craig. But he's 27 and has never played a full season and has had injuries and isn't a good defensive player. We'd have to give up Craig + 2 At Least A or A- prospects to get Felix Hernandez

User avatar
pioneer98
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 21994
Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Location: High A Minors

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by pioneer98 »

I would trade Craig + prospects for Felix in a heartbeat. This is not just a trade for this year, it would also be a trade for the future. As some pointed out, Craig has been injury-prone, and hasn't really proven he can play a full season. Felix would be a real nice replacement for Carpenter. Actually, he'd probably be way better than Carpenter. It would be another classic Cardinals "trade and sign", if they could pull it off. If they can't sign him long-term they still would at least get him through 2014.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18018
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by Magneto2.0 »

I'd give up Craig, Miller and + for him.

User avatar
robbotis
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4791
Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Seattle looking at Craig

Post by robbotis »

Magneto2.0 wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Don't forget that Felix is going to make $20M for the next two years. That's a ton of money and should hinder his trade value a lot. Not a lot of teams can take on $40M in guaranteed payroll while giving up multiple prospects.
Considering that teams are lining up in free agency or near free agency to give 20 million per to guys not as good as Felix(Hamels, Cain, Darvish), I really doubt his market is limited by his contract. Would it be the most efficient(air quotes on efficient?) use of resources? Probably not, but a 26 year old proven 6 WAR pitcher is maybe the most rare thing in baseball. It can't be replicated in the way that Allen Craig can, or that a litany of prospects can, or even dollars spent in free agency can.

+++

I think it would be insane to make Allen Craig a deal-breaker in a Felix Hernandez trade.
This. I love Allen Craig. But he's 27 and has never played a full season and has had injuries and isn't a good defensive player. We'd have to give up Craig + 2 At Least A or A- prospects to get Felix Hernandez
Watch, Felix will get moved for a lot less than a great MLB ready slugger and two A or A- prospects. Hell, the list of teams w/ more than one A rated prospect is extremely small.
My bet is Felix could be had for a lot less than people assume.

Post Reply