Your back must hurt from leaning severely to the right all the time. I don't know how someone can logically come up with this conclusion with all that has happened since Joe asked Obama a question.BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28259
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 30921
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
Painting people in a bad light. Hmm. Interesting concept that's completely foreign to the Republican party...BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
Online
The point of his question is still valid, and Obama answered it. Spread the wealth is the philosophy behind the current income tax system and has been for a century. Where the brackets fall and how much they're taxed has gone up and down the whole time depending on the people in charge and the circumstances.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30614
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
The guy said he was interested in owning a plumbing business, and at this point he calls it a fall back career. Obviously the validity of his story is questionable, and he's been fully cooperative in his interviews. He now has a publicist and is taking advantage of the situation. If he had kept quiet and said "leave me alone" it might be different.BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
The point of his question is still valid, and Obama answered it. Spread the wealth is the philosophy behind the current income tax system and has been for a century. Where the brackets fall and how much they're taxed has gone up and down the whole time depending on the people in charge and the circumstances.
- letsgocards89
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3654
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:35 pm
- Location: Too close for missiles, switching to guns
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
Hence the growing support for a flat tax/Fair Tax restructuring.ghostrunner wrote:The guy said he was interested in owning a plumbing business, and at this point he calls it a fall back career. Obviously the validity of his story is questionable, and he's been fully cooperative in his interviews. He now has a publicist and is taking advantage of the situation. If he had kept quiet and said "leave me alone" it might be different.BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
The point of his question is still valid, and Obama answered it. Spread the wealth is the philosophy behind the current income tax system and has been for a century. Where the brackets fall and how much they're taxed has gone up and down the whole time depending on the people in charge and the circumstances.
Online
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30614
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
I'm skeptical about it, but bringing that up is a better argument than calling someone a socialist. At least that's a policy/philosophy discussion.letsgocards89 wrote:Hence the growing support for a flat tax/Fair Tax restructuring.ghostrunner wrote:The guy said he was interested in owning a plumbing business, and at this point he calls it a fall back career. Obviously the validity of his story is questionable, and he's been fully cooperative in his interviews. He now has a publicist and is taking advantage of the situation. If he had kept quiet and said "leave me alone" it might be different.BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
The point of his question is still valid, and Obama answered it. Spread the wealth is the philosophy behind the current income tax system and has been for a century. Where the brackets fall and how much they're taxed has gone up and down the whole time depending on the people in charge and the circumstances.
- BW23
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12896
- Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
It's bad no matter who does it. I'm not so partisan I can't admit that. There's no reason to discredit him because he asked a question that exposed a fundamental flaw, according to Republicans.Popeye_Card wrote:Painting people in a bad light. Hmm. Interesting concept that's completely foreign to the Republican party...BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
-
Freed Roger
- Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
- Posts: 26073
- Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
Not sure what this fundamental flaw that he exposed? that trickle down policies haven't worked. The only thing Joe exposed is himself as a tool.BW23 wrote:It's bad no matter who does it. I'm not so partisan I can't admit that. There's no reason to discredit him because he asked a question that exposed a fundamental flaw, according to Republicans.Popeye_Card wrote:Painting people in a bad light. Hmm. Interesting concept that's completely foreign to the Republican party...BW23 wrote:The scrutiny took place immediately...digging into his past, looking for ways to put him down. And it wasn't just the news outlets.Popeye_Card wrote:I think people are just annoyed by his self-promotion and obvious grabbing of his 15 minutes of fame.BW23 wrote:I love how someone can ask a presidential candidate a question on the campaign trail and have themselves dragged through the mud by the media. The scrutiny of Joe is beyond the ridiculous level.
I will freely admit that I don't like it that news outlets immediately investigate these instant celebrities within minutes. I'm sure he's just an average Joe. It's the Republicans who made him a huge story, when there's not all that much particularly interesting about his situation.
Did the Republicans make him a huge story? Yeah, I guess. But it was because of the answer that Obama gave that set them off. "Spread the wealth". That's what started it all. And now, the best way to get people to ignore that is to paint Joe in a bad light.
Disgusting.
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28259
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
BRB, pre ordering his book on Amazon and album from ITunes.
- The Green Miles
- Fringe Major League Player
- Posts: 95
- Joined: June 14 07, 9:03 pm
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 30921
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
What "discrediting" is going on? Some news outlets did some background checking on the guy, found out that he's a registered Republican and owes some back taxes. Anyone else poking fun at him is because of his own self-promotion. The McCain campaign is the only one running ads about the guy--it's not like Obama has smeared him in any way. Am I missing something here?BW23 wrote:
It's bad no matter who does it. I'm not so partisan I can't admit that. There's no reason to discredit him because he asked a question that exposed a fundamental flaw, according to Republicans.
And I don't agree that spreading the wealth is a fundamental flaw. The only thing that statement has done has helped the Republicans to make "socialist!" claims. When McCain himself has talked about spreading the wealth around in the past.

