Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178
- Eephus Speed
- All-Star
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
The Red Sox can easily afford both Lackey and Holliday. And probably Beltre, too, if they could salary dump Lowell.
- ManEatingTarp
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: April 16 06, 7:06 pm
- Location: Hog butcher to the world.
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
withAloe wrote:The Red Sox can easily afford both Lackey and Holliday. And probably Beltre, too, if they could salary dump Lowell.
GET OFF MY CLOUD!!!
- robbotis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Garret Atkins brought in as a 3B option now that Freese is in trouble and De Rosa is too expensive?
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
I'm getting this through CT...who says he's listening to Strauss on the radio. So maybe take it with a grain of salt?
According to the post:
Per Strauss:
-we should know on Holliday within the next day.
-offer was for 8 years and the largest the organization has ever offered.
-estimated value of $14-$16MM/yr.
-Boras not impressed.
Per Me:
8 x 14 is 112
8 x 16 is 128
That's a lot of kool-aid...for a long time.
EDIT: Also, if any of this is true and "we should know within the next day", it means we're negotiating.
According to the post:
Per Strauss:
-we should know on Holliday within the next day.
-offer was for 8 years and the largest the organization has ever offered.
-estimated value of $14-$16MM/yr.
-Boras not impressed.
Per Me:
8 x 14 is 112
8 x 16 is 128
That's a lot of kool-aid...for a long time.
EDIT: Also, if any of this is true and "we should know within the next day", it means we're negotiating.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.
And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
- Eephus Speed
- All-Star
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
I agree, especially if it's 16M/yr and not 14M/yr. I don't think 8/128 is enough to get it done, but it's a reasonable initial offer.JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.
And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
That's not a bad starting point.Swingingbunt wrote:I'm getting this through CT...who says he's listening to Strauss on the radio. So maybe take it with a grain of salt?
According to the post:
Per Strauss:
-we should know on Holliday within the next day.
-offer was for 8 years and the largest the organization has ever offered.
-estimated value of $14-$16MM/yr.
-Boras not impressed.
Per Me:
8 x 14 is 112
8 x 16 is 128
That's a lot of kool-aid...for a long time.
EDIT: Also, if any of this is true and "we should know within the next day", it means we're negotiating.
- BigDCardlvr
- All-Star
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: May 19 06, 11:54 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
I can't believe it wouldn't get it done. Throw in an NTC and call a press conference.JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.
And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
8 years of stability, 120 million bucks. low stress environment. Great organization. Pujols. Demonstrated commitment to winning.
where do I sign?
Of course if BoSox are willing to go to 180 million, 60 mil is a lot of coin to throw away.
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
++JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.
And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
I'd rather go 6 years @ 18 million rather than 8 @ 14 million.
I don't know though, what would Boras want? It seems like the Cards gave him the years but below the going rate. My guess is that other teams will give him the going rate, but not the years.
What is more important?
- Maclowery
- Child Pot Activist
- Posts: 7742
- Joined: June 15 06, 7:27 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Wow, I never would have guessed the Cards would offer an 8 year deal. Here's to the tiny part of Holliday that wants to say "screw it, Boras, I wanna bat after AP for eight years. I'm taking it."
Do you think the Sox will offer something like 8/140 and trump us? Or are they hoping for a shorter contract with more cash per year?
Do you think the Sox will offer something like 8/140 and trump us? Or are they hoping for a shorter contract with more cash per year?




