Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
Eephus Speed
All-Star
Posts: 1642
Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Eephus Speed »

The Red Sox can easily afford both Lackey and Holliday. And probably Beltre, too, if they could salary dump Lowell.

User avatar
ManEatingTarp
Veteran Player
Posts: 526
Joined: April 16 06, 7:06 pm
Location: Hog butcher to the world.

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by ManEatingTarp »

withAloe wrote:The Red Sox can easily afford both Lackey and Holliday. And probably Beltre, too, if they could salary dump Lowell.

GET OFF MY CLOUD!!!

;)

User avatar
robbotis
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4791
Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by robbotis »

Garret Atkins brought in as a 3B option now that Freese is in trouble and De Rosa is too expensive?

User avatar
Swingingbunt
All-Star
Posts: 2904
Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Swingingbunt »

I'm getting this through CT...who says he's listening to Strauss on the radio. So maybe take it with a grain of salt?

According to the post:

Per Strauss:
-we should know on Holliday within the next day.
-offer was for 8 years and the largest the organization has ever offered.
-estimated value of $14-$16MM/yr.
-Boras not impressed.

Per Me:

8 x 14 is 112
8 x 16 is 128

That's a lot of kool-aid...for a long time.

EDIT: Also, if any of this is true and "we should know within the next day", it means we're negotiating.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by JL21 »

If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.

And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.

User avatar
Eephus Speed
All-Star
Posts: 1642
Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Eephus Speed »

JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.

And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
I agree, especially if it's 16M/yr and not 14M/yr. I don't think 8/128 is enough to get it done, but it's a reasonable initial offer.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Swingingbunt wrote:I'm getting this through CT...who says he's listening to Strauss on the radio. So maybe take it with a grain of salt?

According to the post:

Per Strauss:
-we should know on Holliday within the next day.
-offer was for 8 years and the largest the organization has ever offered.
-estimated value of $14-$16MM/yr.
-Boras not impressed.

Per Me:

8 x 14 is 112
8 x 16 is 128

That's a lot of kool-aid...for a long time.

EDIT: Also, if any of this is true and "we should know within the next day", it means we're negotiating.
That's not a bad starting point.

User avatar
BigDCardlvr
All-Star
Posts: 1548
Joined: May 19 06, 11:54 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by BigDCardlvr »

JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.

And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
I can't believe it wouldn't get it done. Throw in an NTC and call a press conference.

8 years of stability, 120 million bucks. low stress environment. Great organization. Pujols. Demonstrated commitment to winning.

where do I sign?

Of course if BoSox are willing to go to 180 million, 60 mil is a lot of coin to throw away.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

JL21 wrote:If that's legit, even if they don't get him, I'm berry berry happy with ownership right now. That's a damn good offer.

And yeah, it's less than the Tex deal last season. BFD. The Cardinals aren't the Yankees. I'm not real keen on going to 8 years but it shows that they're willing to go above and beyond to get the deal done.
++

I'd rather go 6 years @ 18 million rather than 8 @ 14 million.

I don't know though, what would Boras want? It seems like the Cards gave him the years but below the going rate. My guess is that other teams will give him the going rate, but not the years.

What is more important?

User avatar
Maclowery
Child Pot Activist
Posts: 7742
Joined: June 15 06, 7:27 am
Location: NYC

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Maclowery »

Wow, I never would have guessed the Cards would offer an 8 year deal. Here's to the tiny part of Holliday that wants to say "screw it, Boras, I wanna bat after AP for eight years. I'm taking it."

Do you think the Sox will offer something like 8/140 and trump us? Or are they hoping for a shorter contract with more cash per year?

Locked