Page 103 of 139
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:48 pm
by dmarx114
JCShutout wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:45 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:39 pm
jagtrader wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:33 pm
I agree that trading players like Flaherty, Hicks and DeJong, who have been largely a hindrance to the team’s success the past 2-3 seasons, is fun.
The last few days are pretty much the draft 2.0.
Yay, we have new minor leaguers!
So much better than winning a division!!!!!!
Who said it’s more fun than winning a division? (Hint: no one)
Given that the team is already really bad, It’s more fun to trade spare parts for prospects than to still be bad, but have less prospects.
Post 998
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:49 pm
by haltz
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:42 pm
haltz wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:41 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:39 pm
So much better than winning a division!!!!!!
Nobody said that. People can enjoy baseball how they want.
Actually, somebody said that.
And yes, people can enjoy baseball how they want.
And I can think a certain type of fan behavior is crazy.
I just re-read the last few pages and I don't see it.
Maybe just let them enjoy it without the sanctimony. We know the way you do it is the best.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:49 pm
by jagtrader
The Cardinals had no path to building a strong pitching staff in 2024 and beyond without adding significantly from outside the organization. A downturn was coming one way or another.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:51 pm
by WAR God
GeddyWrox wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:47 pm
WAR God wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:39 pm
GeddyWrox wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:23 pm
WAR God wrote: ↑August 1 23, 12:29 pm
O’Neill
Carlson
Nootbaar
Those are the guys who can and should be playing outfield when they are on the field. Trading away one of those ensures that you have a bad outfielder on the field at all times.
I anticipate they stand pat.
Where do you put Walker then?
Walker, Gorman, Goldschmidt, Arenado get time at 1B, 3B, DH. Walker can also get spot starts in the corner outfield positions, depending on matchup.
There is something of a logjam.
Agree there is a logjam. It's of Mo's creation.
I don't think it's good for young guys like Walker to bounce around position to position, and only starting 4 or 5 games a week. Walker and Gorman especially need a steady position, and to be in the lineup every day (excepting the occasional rest day).
If the club is as committed to Walker as they seem to be (rightfully)... they need to free up that logjam.
I don’t disagree with you at all. The team needs to not screw this up. It’s entirely possible that today could be the last day they get anything of value for Nolan Arenado. Guys can fall apart overnight at his age. Do they hang on and take a chance, or do they move him and create an opening for young player? Glad I’m not the one making that decision.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:52 pm
by ghostrunner
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:48 pm
JCShutout wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:45 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:39 pm
jagtrader wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:33 pm
I agree that trading players like Flaherty, Hicks and DeJong, who have been largely a hindrance to the team’s success the past 2-3 seasons, is fun.
The last few days are pretty much the draft 2.0.
Yay, we have new minor leaguers!
So much better than winning a division!!!!!!
Who said it’s more fun than winning a division? (Hint: no one)
Given that the team is already really bad, It’s more fun to trade spare parts for prospects than to still be bad, but have less prospects.
Post 998
Oh good, a sidequest
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:53 pm
by Lesson
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:25 pm
3 straight 90+ win seasons (covid year excluded) isn't good enough for this fan base.
Some folks here should root for the Yankees or Dodgers instead. You would be much happier.
2021 took an absolute miracle to get into a play-in game due to the Reds and Padres having historic implosions, a 17 game win streak in September, and Happ/Lester eating innings and being close to average after they were acquired. They basically gave up on 2021 and acquired Happ/Lester to just eat innings and not destroy the rotation or bullpen without a sliver of thought for making the POs. If they were aiming to do that, they would’ve done more.
After 2021, FO said they’d invest in pitching. They did the bare minimum in signing Matz, dealt with pitching issues going into the deadline, made 2 good trades in getting Montgomery and Quintana(who they could have signed in the off-season), and lost to the Phillies in the WC series.
They then disingenuously claimed payroll would go up in 2023, which it did via an accounting maneuver, and had the same exact problems with the pitching rotation as they did in 2021 and 2022 that is exacerbated by the defense being bad.
That’s why I’m not giving them a pass. They’ve made the same damn mistake 3 seasons in a row and haven’t done anything to rectify that. The TDL in 2023 is a step in the right direction, but until they back up their talk of wanting to get pitching for 2024 via trade or FA, they don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:54 pm
by ThatGuy
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:42 pm
Actually, somebody said that.
And yes, people can enjoy baseball how they want.
And I can think a certain type of fan behavior is crazy.
Man, you really need to stop lecturing people and being condescending. You're beating a dead horse and we all get it by now.
It's well understood that 89 wins and a Wild Card/first round exit checks all the boxes for you, but despite your opinion that the rest of us don't deserve to be Cardinals fans, a lot of people are excited that a gut punch is going to lead to necessary improvements that might actually get us back to the World Series.
What you find to be sufficient has long been stale for a lot of other people.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:55 pm
by Magneto2.0
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:57 pm
by Radbird
Flaherty to Orioles, perhaps packaged with Carlson, would make sense given the O’s farm depth.
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Posted: August 1 23, 1:58 pm
by JCShutout
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:48 pm
JCShutout wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:45 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:39 pm
jagtrader wrote: ↑August 1 23, 1:33 pm
I agree that trading players like Flaherty, Hicks and DeJong, who have been largely a hindrance to the team’s success the past 2-3 seasons, is fun.
The last few days are pretty much the draft 2.0.
Yay, we have new minor leaguers!
So much better than winning a division!!!!!!
Who said it’s more fun than winning a division? (Hint: no one)
Given that the team is already really bad, It’s more fun to trade spare parts for prospects than to still be bad, but have less prospects.
Post 998
This one?
quote=MrCrowesGarden post_id=2094959 time=1690917459 user_id=350]
It would be nice to get a top 100 guy back, but the major leaguers are dogwater so can't really expect it.
My hot take is I'd rather prefer this season than another 85-win, bounced in the Wild Card crapfest.
[/quote]
Wouldn’t “bounced in the wild card” imply the division isn’t won?