General Soccer Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
MrSaigon

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by MrSaigon »

They don't need it. They just need the league to let them use the Yedlin money now to buy down Alonso below DP. Of course, buying down a DP can't be done at this point in the season--just like restructuring a DP to non-DP through extension (lot of good it did him) couldn't be done at this point in the season until Shalrie Joseph last year. But then, they would also need the league to flip back the DPs aren't allocated rule once more. All doable.

Ok, I'm getting ridiculous at this point. But in all honesty, with this league, just barely, or maybe not at all.

It's why Merritt Paulson (Timbers owner) needs to get on the phone with Jermaine and convince him to say he'll come to MLS only if he can come to the Timbers. I bet the league would make it happen. Maybe, like Seattle, we would have to give up zero assets as well.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »


User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by thrill »

Awkward acting, but Sydney Leroux is ridiculous. Henry was funny, the Frenchest.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by stlouie_lipp »

This is something I wanted to ask during the WC, and seeing that new Dick's soccer commercial reminded me. What exactly constitutes a tackling foul giving the opponent a free kick?

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by thrill »

stlouie_lipp wrote:This is something I wanted to ask during the WC, and seeing that new Dick's soccer commercial reminded me. What exactly constitutes a tackling foul giving the opponent a free kick?
It's more what isn't a foul. Basically, get ball first and any contact judged to be incidental by the ref is not a foul. Everything else is.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_tackle

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

trill wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote:This is something I wanted to ask during the WC, and seeing that new Dick's soccer commercial reminded me. What exactly constitutes a tackling foul giving the opponent a free kick?
It's more what isn't a foul. Basically, get ball first and any contact judged to be incidental by the ref is not a foul. Everything else is.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_tackle
Yup, play the ball, not the man.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

But you can see a guy play the ball, get to the ball first, make some contact, then either get called for foul or not.

The way I'm understanding thrill is the ref determines whether the contact was incidental or not.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by thrill »

lukethedrifter wrote:But you can see a guy play the ball, get to the ball first, make some contact, then either get called for foul or not.

The way I'm understanding thrill is the ref determines whether the contact was incidental or not.
Yeah, it's totally subjective.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Other than the elite leagues, aren't slide tackles mostly being outlawed?

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: General Soccer Thread

Post by thrill »

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Post Reply