Edmonds heading to San Diego

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18089
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Magneto2.0 »

keener98 wrote:I cant believe there are Cardinal fans upset about this. What did you expect for a 37 yr CF whos body has taken a beating over his career, and his numbers are on a obvious decline? If I was a Cardinal fan Id be happy to not have to pay the whole 8 million left on his contract now.
Basically. People here are being pretty naive about Edmonds value. I'm just glad we got a player with any kind of upside what so ever.

User avatar
New Pagodi
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4219
Joined: April 18 06, 11:30 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by New Pagodi »

Image

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by cardsfansince82 »

Magneto2.0 wrote:
keener98 wrote:I cant believe there are Cardinal fans upset about this. What did you expect for a 37 yr CF whos body has taken a beating over his career, and his numbers are on a obvious decline? If I was a Cardinal fan Id be happy to not have to pay the whole 8 million left on his contract now.
Basically. People here are being pretty naive about Edmonds value. I'm just glad we got a player with any kind of upside what so ever.
I for one am not naive enough to think that Edmonds had much value at all on the open market. But he did have more value than that to me as a fan than to unceremoniously dump him for a guy that in all likelihood won't sniff the major leagues. Almost every Cardinal fan that I know would rather see Jimmy patrolling CF for one last year and finish it out in a Cardinal uni than to see this happen (even if he is a shell of his former self....but who's to say he doesn't have a good year ahead of him?). If you believe what management has been saying, the money is there to make phantom signings if they come along. What does saving $8 million for one year do? Do you honestly think that money is going to get spent? At this point of the offseason there aren't many (if any) options out there to commit that money to anyway. This year is already looking pretty bleak and they just took away one of the few things to look forward to and one of the few reasons to spend money to see this team play. If the plan was to save money all along then why lie about it? Why even pick up Izzy's option? How many games is he going to be needed in with this roster?

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18089
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Magneto2.0 »

cardsfansince82 wrote:
Magneto2.0 wrote:
keener98 wrote:I cant believe there are Cardinal fans upset about this. What did you expect for a 37 yr CF whos body has taken a beating over his career, and his numbers are on a obvious decline? If I was a Cardinal fan Id be happy to not have to pay the whole 8 million left on his contract now.
Basically. People here are being pretty naive about Edmonds value. I'm just glad we got a player with any kind of upside what so ever.
I for one am not naive enough to think that Edmonds had much value at all on the open market. But he did have more value than that to me as a fan than to unceremoniously dump him for a guy that in all likelihood won't sniff the major leagues. Almost every Cardinal fan that I know would rather see Jimmy patrolling CF for one last year and finish it out in a Cardinal uni than to see this happen (even if he is a shell of his former self....but who's to say he doesn't have a good year ahead of him?). If you believe what management has been saying, the money is there to make phantom signings if they come along. What does saving $8 million for one year do? Do you honestly think that money is going to get spent? At this point of the offseason there aren't many (if any) options out there to commit that money to anyway. This year is already looking pretty bleak and they just took away one of the few things to look forward to and one of the few reasons to spend money to see this team play. If the plan was to save money all along then why lie about it? Why even pick up Izzy's option? How many games is he going to be needed in with this roster?
I wouldn't rule out him making it to the majors. Based off what someone posted earlier, he's probably gonna start next season in Triple A. He's not a typical single A player. I don't think he's gonna be much of a player, though.

And I was a fan of Edmonds, but it's time to part ways with him and Scott Rolen, imo. He is old, isn't productive and making too much money.

The 8 million could be used to pay for a pitcher/player that could help us beyond 2008.

And I would not be surprised of Izzy was traded by All-star break to a contending team.

User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Hungary Jack »

Mixed feelings about this. I wanted to see Edmonds retire as a Cardinal in 2008 (but not in 2009, 2010, or whatever).

But I am very ready for a new era to begin, even if it means rebuiding and stinking for a year or two. It is time to start cutting unproductive ties with past glories, regardless of how painful it is. Hopefully Moz has someone young and productive in mind for redeploying the payroll to. I have no idea whom that could be. Maybe Blanton?

I'll remember Edmonds for his 2004 season, when he was at his best.

User avatar
Leroy
a bad penny always turns up
Posts: 25225
Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
Contact:

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Leroy »

I think we are all smart enough to realize that Jimmy had zero trade value. So why do it?

I look forward to paying attention to about 2% of next season's games when Albert is up.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12625
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jagtrader »

Hungary Jack wrote:Hopefully Moz has someone young and productive in mind for redeploying the payroll to.
Hopefully. But as we sit in the middle of the third consecutive terrible off-season, the Cards have lost the benefit of the doubt.

sept79
Everyday Player
Posts: 192
Joined: June 15 06, 1:25 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by sept79 »

I look forward to seeing Rasmus and Ankiel patrolling the outfield. Loved the young, youthful, 'give it all you've got' Jim Edmonds, not the recent, ageing version.

I think the trade hastens us along the road to recovery by allowing young prospects to gain experience.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18089
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Magneto2.0 »

jagtrader wrote:
Hungary Jack wrote:Hopefully Moz has someone young and productive in mind for redeploying the payroll to.
Hopefully. But as we sit in the middle of the third consecutive terrible off-season, the Cards have lost the benefit of the doubt.
Until the fans stop coming to the games every year, I doubt management cares too much about some disgruntle fans on a message board.

Losing benefit of the doubt = management wont care

Now, start losing ticket sales, and now management will start caring.

Btw, I'm not saying that management doesn't care about the team, I really think they do, and are trying to build for the future. I'm just saying, generally speaking, you can't expect owners to care too much about "fans being displeased" with a product, when they are still putting money in the owners pockets. Obviously, they aren't too upset by it.
Last edited by Magneto2.0 on December 15 07, 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12625
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jagtrader »

Magneto2.0 wrote:
jagtrader wrote:
Hungary Jack wrote:Hopefully Moz has someone young and productive in mind for redeploying the payroll to.
Hopefully. But as we sit in the middle of the third consecutive terrible off-season, the Cards have lost the benefit of the doubt.
Until the fans stop coming to the games every year, I doubt management cares too much about some disgruntle fans on a message board.
I never said management cared. I just said we've reached the point where we can't expect them to do anything significant just because they've supposedly created "payroll flexibility."

Locked