Mike Trout

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Mike Trout

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

InvincibleCakeEater wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:No, the idea wasn't to say "Mike Trout ain't nevah gonna be nothin'". I just found it amusing after reading this thread gushing about his play that he's off to a 4 for 30 start. I think I have prospect fatigue or something since half the Cubs Top 10 has flamed out this year.
He's no Jon Jay, that's for sure.

/joeybomb
No doubt but can he at least be a colby rasmus?

/ joeybombin your joeybomb

Slider
All-Star
Posts: 1643
Joined: July 23 08, 2:36 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by Slider »

Would you do

Rasmus/Martinez for Trout?

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Mike Trout

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Yes.

Slider
All-Star
Posts: 1643
Joined: July 23 08, 2:36 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by Slider »

Crazy part is I a not sure that is enough to get him. I am thrilled he made it to the majors but will miss seeing him play here in NLR.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by jim »

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:No, the idea wasn't to say "Mike Trout ain't nevah gonna be nothin'". I just found it amusing after reading this thread gushing about his play that he's off to a 4 for 30 start. I think I have prospect fatigue or something since half the Cubs Top 10 has flamed out this year.
I'm going to gush ... he's a special player and 30 AB's ain't gonna change that.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by jim »

I haven't seen Martinez but the immediate answer is yes, in a heartbeat. I know people are getting maybe callous with the hype around Harper and then Heyward before him, but it's legit. With Trout that is as good of a trio of position prospects coming that I can remember. I'd really put Trout in that conversation, I think he's that good.

User avatar
themiddle54
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4524
Joined: August 24 10, 2:49 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by themiddle54 »

jim wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:No, the idea wasn't to say "Mike Trout ain't nevah gonna be nothin'". I just found it amusing after reading this thread gushing about his play that he's off to a 4 for 30 start. I think I have prospect fatigue or something since half the Cubs Top 10 has flamed out this year.
I'm going to gush ... he's a special player and 30 AB's ain't gonna change that.
I'll gush too.

I've watched most of his games live, and have gone back and watched his PA that I missed on MLB.tv, and he's hitting the ball hard just about every time up. 4-30 could easily be 9-30 and a respectable average. He's hitting fine, they just are not falling in. F Gutierrez and Cocco have both robbed him of XBHes, he hit a liner right at Ichiro that comes to mind, and just about every ball I recall seeing him hit on the ground has been hard but right at someone.

His defense and baserunning are downright breathtaking and his makeup is through-the-roof great.

TT--it doesn't help that the baby bears traded away 30% of their top 10 prospects before the season started.

User avatar
cards2468
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 14745
Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

Re: Mike Trout

Post by cards2468 »

And McNutt is still a good prospect, just blisters issues and bruised ribs have held him down most of the season. I'd still send him to AAA next year with the possibility of reaching the bigs later that year.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Re: Mike Trout

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

themiddle54 wrote:TT--it doesn't help that the baby bears traded away 30% of their top 10 prospects before the season started.
20%, but I digress, I tried to edit it out but got quoted. The prospect fatigue comes more with being exposed to a lot of stuff that ignores quite a bit about the certainty of prospects realizing their potential. Whether it's Cubs fans saying to "trade everyone, blow it up, get prospects, rabble rabble", or Dave Cameron putting Trout #21 on the trade value list, I feel like this is a lesson we should have learned by now. That's to take nothing away from Trout though, who I haven't seen but sounds like a super fun player to watch and has an exciting pedigree.

User avatar
cpebbles
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8829
Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm

Re: Mike Trout

Post by cpebbles »

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:20%, but I digress, I tried to edit it out but got quoted. The prospect fatigue comes more with being exposed to a lot of stuff that ignores quite a bit about the certainty of prospects realizing their potential. Whether it's Cubs fans saying to "trade everyone, blow it up, get prospects, rabble rabble", or Dave Cameron putting Trout #21 on the trade value list, I feel like this is a lesson we should have learned by now. That's to take nothing away from Trout though, who I haven't seen but sounds like a super fun player to watch and has an exciting pedigree.
I take more issue with Heyward at #8 than Trout at #21. Last year was an absolute best-case scenario for Heyward: His defense graded out as plus, his BABIP was high, and his BB% was a lot higher than you would expect from his individual plate discipline stats. The guy has already maximized his skill set, unless you think he's suddenly going to post a legendary Hall of Fame HR/FB rate despite not having the swing for it. I see a huge contract and a lot of 3.5 to 4 win seasons in his future, if he can finally stay healthy.

Post Reply