Page 3 of 6

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: September 30 25, 6:55 pm
by Joe Shlabotnik
jagtrader wrote:
September 30 25, 5:50 pm
Shildt is terrible.
I liked him .

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: September 30 25, 8:03 pm
by CardsofSTL
Shildt was ok. His teams have all won 90+ games. Can't argue with success.

That said I was surprised when he was fired but not necessarily broken up about it. He always seemed like a transitional guy.

Transitioning to Marmol was kind of odd though.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 1 25, 12:19 pm
by KenBoyer14
jagtrader wrote:
September 30 25, 5:50 pm
Shildt is terrible.
Yeah, Manager of the Year in 2019. He's terrible. Glad you know more than baseball writers. You know, the guys that watch the game every day.

I never said he was perfect, but to say he is terrible is a bit much.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 1 25, 3:04 pm
by Joe Shlabotnik
KenBoyer14 wrote:
October 1 25, 12:19 pm
jagtrader wrote:
September 30 25, 5:50 pm
Shildt is terrible.
Yeah, Manager of the Year in 2019. He's terrible. Glad you know more than baseball writers. You know, the guys that watch the game every day.

I never said he was perfect, but to say he is terrible is a bit much.
Ok. I didn't just like him, I loved him. He would have done anything for the Cardinals franchise, was liked by his players, striving to improve, and I even loved his quirky post-game thing with his water bottle. I could have grown old and died with him as manager. Sue me.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 2 25, 2:30 am
by MrCrowesGarden
Lesson wrote:
September 30 25, 3:41 pm
MrCrowesGarden wrote:
September 30 25, 10:50 am
jagtrader wrote:
September 30 25, 9:51 am
They’ve won the division twice since 2015 while maintaining a competitive advantage over all but one of the Central teams. They’re entering Year 4 of a rebuild that is just getting started. Most of Mozeliak’s achievements are ancient history and he stayed way too long. Any good he did is overshadowed by what could be a very long playoff drought he created.
It really does feel like that offseason after the 2015 season was a turning point. They were scorned by Heyward and Price, and even though they were spared from both, they didn’t get better players while becoming increasingly conservative as an organization that was already conservative to start.
Goldschmidt and Arenado were better hitters than anyone on that 2015 team.

I’d argue the decline was more due to failed attempts at developing pitchers and half-assed measures at acquiring pitchers in free agency.
They got both those players because it cost them nothing. Great if you can get it, terrible way to expect business to be conducted. Also the half-assed measures at acquiring pitchers in free agency gets right to the heart of what I posted.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 2 25, 10:33 am
by sighyoung
CardsofSTL wrote:
September 30 25, 8:03 pm
Shildt was ok. His teams have all won 90+ games. Can't argue with success.

That said I was surprised when he was fired but not necessarily broken up about it. He always seemed like a transitional guy.

Transitioning to Marmol was kind of odd though.
I remember posters here regularly questioning Shildt's bullpen management and in-game decisions. I do think that the team's defense improved considerably in his first full year as manager, and the players seemed to work well with him, so he was respected in the clubhouse.

I did think he was on his way to being fired prior to the 17-game winning streak in September 2021--the team was treading water most of the year--but after that, he seemed to bought himself an extension. The firing was all the more surprising because Shildt was their baby: a manager developed in their own minor-league system, that they were now expelling out of the organization. I wondered if management saw him as an interim manager all along, and were flummoxed when the team suddenly made the playoffs.

Whatever people thought about him as an in-game decision-maker, he was a respected baseball man in general, and to lose that from your organization, especially the way it happened, looked bad.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 2 25, 12:28 pm
by CardsofSTL
sighyoung wrote:
October 2 25, 10:33 am
CardsofSTL wrote:
September 30 25, 8:03 pm
Shildt was ok. His teams have all won 90+ games. Can't argue with success.

That said I was surprised when he was fired but not necessarily broken up about it. He always seemed like a transitional guy.

Transitioning to Marmol was kind of odd though.
I remember posters here regularly questioning Shildt's bullpen management and in-game decisions. I do think that the team's defense improved considerably in his first full year as manager, and the players seemed to work well with him, so he was respected in the clubhouse.

I did think he was on his way to being fired prior to the 17-game winning streak in September 2021--the team was treading water most of the year--but after that, he seemed to bought himself an extension. The firing was all the more surprising because Shildt was their baby: a manager developed in their own minor-league system, that they were now expelling out of the organization. I wondered if management saw him as an interim manager all along, and were flummoxed when the team suddenly made the playoffs.

Whatever people thought about him as an in-game decision-maker, he was a respected baseball man in general, and to lose that from your organization, especially the way it happened, looked bad.
I was surprised they gave him the job fulltime after they fired Matheny tbh. I think they thought he would be a company yes man and then he wasn't and that ultimately led to him being on the outs. But that is all just conjecture.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 2 25, 1:01 pm
by Joe Shlabotnik
I think that's a pretty good conjecture.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 3 25, 1:26 am
by MrCrowesGarden
I know it's because we've moved on from BDW2 to BDW3, but in ten years we went from (by all accounts from Goold and the like) the Cardinals believing they would sign Price and Heyward for a combined $350 million plus to having to be strong-armed by the players union to sign Phil Maton after NFL teams signed free agents in the span of a decade.

Re: Thank You Mo

Posted: October 3 25, 7:28 am
by heyzeus
MrCrowesGarden wrote:
October 3 25, 1:26 am
I know it's because we've moved on from BDW2 to BDW3, but in ten years we went from (by all accounts from Goold and the like) the Cardinals believing they would sign Price and Heyward for a combined $350 million plus to having to be strong-armed by the players union to sign Phil Maton after NFL teams signed free agents in the span of a decade.
The thing I really started noticing over the past few years was the language of ownership/management. They used to talk in terms of absolutes: The goal is winning the World Series. Anything less was unacceptable. That gradually became a goal of making the playoffs and seeing what happens, which of course is colored by the expansion of the playoffs. Then the goal became fielding a "competitive team," which means anything and therefore nothing.

For the last year or so the phraseology has been around a "reset" which means even less. It's not a rebuild, because that is conceding defeat and scares off fans with visions of Marlins style firesales. But it's also not going for it, ie, attempting to win a championship or even set a goal of a playoff run. We continue to half-measure our way into obscurity under the new Dewitt regime.

I hope Bloom is the genius people think he is, because he's expected to turn chicken [expletive] into chicken salad. It won't be through free agency.