Re: OFFICIAL TLR HEAD SCRATCHER THREAD
Posted: July 24 10, 1:43 pm
Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://www.gatewayredbirds.com/forum/
I did not see the game, listened up to the 6th and picked it up again in the 9th. So I completely missed this situation, but looking through the game logs I am a little surprised that we didn't but with Winn. Down 2 I can understand not bunting with Ryan, but I'm a little surprised that we didn't bunt to get the tying run to 3rd.Rieges wrote:Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
I was also curious about the not bunting, but figured that perhaps it was Yadi as the lead runner being a factor in TLR's decision.jim wrote:I did not see the game, listened up to the 6th and picked it up again in the 9th. So I completely missed this situation, but looking through the game logs I am a little surprised that we didn't but with Winn. Down 2 I can understand not bunting with Ryan, but I'm a little surprised that we didn't bunt to get the tying run to 3rd.Rieges wrote:Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
Only explanation is that the way the wind was blowing he really wanted to go for a big inning. But we will lay a damn bunt down in the 2nd inning to push a run across but not there.
With 1+2 if the 3B fields the bunt then Yadi's grandma could be running the bases and she'd get there. I hate to comment on something that I didn't see but it sure seems like that situation called for a sacrifice.st.lewis11 wrote:I was also curious about the not bunting, but figured that perhaps it was Yadi as the lead runner being a factor in TLR's decision.jim wrote:I did not see the game, listened up to the 6th and picked it up again in the 9th. So I completely missed this situation, but looking through the game logs I am a little surprised that we didn't but with Winn. Down 2 I can understand not bunting with Ryan, but I'm a little surprised that we didn't bunt to get the tying run to 3rd.Rieges wrote:Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
Only explanation is that the way the wind was blowing he really wanted to go for a big inning. But we will lay a damn bunt down in the 2nd inning to push a run across but not there.
Completely agree; I was trying to come up with what was in TLR's head.jim wrote:With 1+2 if the 3B fields the bunt then Yadi's grandma could be running the bases and she'd get there. I hate to comment on something that I didn't see but it sure seems like that situation called for a sacrifice.st.lewis11 wrote:I was also curious about the not bunting, but figured that perhaps it was Yadi as the lead runner being a factor in TLR's decision.jim wrote:I did not see the game, listened up to the 6th and picked it up again in the 9th. So I completely missed this situation, but looking through the game logs I am a little surprised that we didn't but with Winn. Down 2 I can understand not bunting with Ryan, but I'm a little surprised that we didn't bunt to get the tying run to 3rd.Rieges wrote:Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
Only explanation is that the way the wind was blowing he really wanted to go for a big inning. But we will lay a damn bunt down in the 2nd inning to push a run across but not there.
Good luck.st.lewis11 wrote:Completely agree; I was trying to come up with what was in TLR's head.jim wrote:With 1+2 if the 3B fields the bunt then Yadi's grandma could be running the bases and she'd get there. I hate to comment on something that I didn't see but it sure seems like that situation called for a sacrifice.st.lewis11 wrote:I was also curious about the not bunting, but figured that perhaps it was Yadi as the lead runner being a factor in TLR's decision.jim wrote:I did not see the game, listened up to the 6th and picked it up again in the 9th. So I completely missed this situation, but looking through the game logs I am a little surprised that we didn't but with Winn. Down 2 I can understand not bunting with Ryan, but I'm a little surprised that we didn't bunt to get the tying run to 3rd.Rieges wrote:Why would you not have Ryan and/or Winn bunt in that situation with 1st and 2nd and no outs and 1 out respectively?
Only explanation is that the way the wind was blowing he really wanted to go for a big inning. But we will lay a damn bunt down in the 2nd inning to push a run across but not there.
I've been wondering what he has been doing on the roster for a while now. He's not very good defensively, it would be one thing if we had a Mike Matheny type glove back there but we don't.ghostrunner wrote:Kind of late to make this complaint, but what's the purpose of Jason Larue being on the roster if he can't play an 11am game after a night game. I know he played a little last night, but come on.