Elite 8: 1. Barry Bonds vs. 2. Stan Musial

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball

1. Barry Bonds vs. 2. Stan Musial

Barry Bonds
22
38%
Stan Musial
36
62%
 
Total votes: 58

User avatar
Dillagii
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7926
Joined: April 18 06, 2:37 pm

Post by Dillagii »

Jackass gets my vote and its not even close.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30535
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Post by thrill »

Bizzonds.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Post by TimeForGuinness »

I voted against Bonds, and I will continue to do so.

IMHO, steroids have nothing or little to do with it.

What has to do with it is Bonds wearing body armor and crowding the plate to take away the inside strike. (shrinking his k-zone) Take the armor off, and he moves away from the plate...and he may not have been the same hitter; or just take the armor off and be a man.

Now, this is all legal in the eyes of baseball, and he took advantage of it (which makes me wonder why others don't)...but I don't care for it.

My vote goes to Stan.

JMHO.

User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18696
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Post by cardinalkarp »

Now, this is all legal in the eyes of baseball, and he took advantage of it (which makes me wonder why others don't)...but I don't care for it.
I don't think that type of body armor is legal anymore. He's been grandfathered into that rule and that's why he's still allowed to wear it. Someone correct me if I'm wrong?

User avatar
Wekse5
Everyday Player
Posts: 286
Joined: June 1 06, 2:23 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by Wekse5 »

body armor or not, bonds was/is the better player.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Post by TimeForGuinness »

If someone can do a quick analysis of Bonds and Musial over the same age span (without body armor), I would appreciate it.

Too lazy

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22623
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Post by haltz »

TimeForGuinness wrote:If someone can do a quick analysis of Bonds and Musial over the same age span (without body armor), I would appreciate it.

Too lazy
Studies have shown that elbow protection inflates OPS+ by about 20%. Take away the steroids, which have been proven to inflate OPS+ by another 32%, and it's obvious that Bonds is basically Eddie Murray.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Post by TimeForGuinness »

haltz wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:If someone can do a quick analysis of Bonds and Musial over the same age span (without body armor), I would appreciate it.

Too lazy
Studies have shown that elbow protection inflates OPS+ by about 20%. Take away the steroids, which have been proven to inflate OPS+ by another 32%, and it's obvious that Bonds is basically Eddie Murray.
lol

I was just curious.

Locked