Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
number9
Veteran Player
Posts: 998
Joined: April 18 06, 10:31 pm
Location: Saint Louis

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by number9 »

Let's throw in some more Hot Stove "rumors" and "sources"...just for fun:
This morning, Adam Rubin of the Daily News wrote, citing team insiders, “Omar Minaya expected the salary demands of Matt Holliday and Jason Bay to be too high for the Mets.”
Link
In a report for the New York Post, Joel Sherman writes, “The Yankees are much more focused on Johnny Damon, Andy Pettitte and Hideki Matsui than they are on Jason Bay, Matt Holliday and John Lackey.”

<snip>

According to Sherman, the Yankees would prefer to give one-year deals to their own free agents, ‘than give another long-term contract to a thirty-something player such as Lackey.’

Holliday will be 30 years old in January.
Link

User avatar
Eephus Speed
All-Star
Posts: 1642
Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Eephus Speed »

Would the Angels maybe put Rivera in right field, Abreu at DH and open left field for Holliday?

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Fat Strat »

I've heard a little of the Angels and Holliday's names being mentioned together, but it's just reporters throwing out possible landing spots. If the Yankees are out of the discussion then I will honestly say that there is NO REASON why we don't win the competition for him. The # of teams that can throw big money his direction is limited to a handful.
I tend to come from the other direction. Rasmus has loads of room to improve. Ludwick, Molina, and Skip have all established pretty reliable baselines. If anything, Lohse should improve- hampered by really fluky injuries, and wound up with his worst season as a SP since 2004. Ryan.... well, we'll see about Ryan. I'm mostly with you in that I think he's more likely to decline than improve. OTOH, you're jettisoning some 1260 AB's that went to Thurston, Barden, K. Greene, and Dunkiel. I know that those AB's won't soundly be replaced with superstars, but it's not unreasonable to expect a mild goose out of those AB's. You'd have to try hard to be worse than what that five-headed monster provided.


You're also jettisoning DeRosa and Holliday's production which, imo, had a larger positive impact on the club than their replacements had negative. I just wonder what this club would have looked like (in the standings) without the ridiculously hot April where Thurston and Barden were playing well over their heads and competing for rookies of the month.

Let's take a look at the standings --
April 16 7 133 96 .696
May 13 14 95 99 .481
June 12 17 118 144 .414
July 16 11 124 96 .593

We had DeRosa in July; Holliday acquired late July.

It's impossible to read anything significant into those numbers, but needless to say we were at our worse when we weren't getting insane production from insane sources (April with our 3rd baseman) and at our best when we had the best club (July-August).

IF we assume that this is a .500 team with replacement level production from 3rd and LF AND IF We assume all else is equal, you still need 10 wins from somewhere to make yourself a legitimate contender. And that doesn't count the loss of a Pineiro performing over his head or the likely decline of Franklin. Granted, we'll hopefully get improvement from Rasmus and Lohse (two good sources for a high probability of improvement)...

All that to say that the "mild goose" that we should get from avoiding the "five headed monster" still won't do the trick, barring ridiculously significant improvement from Rasmus (which, honestly, does anyone expect that?) As good as Rasmus might be, he's not going to post an OPS in the 900 range and jump his 2.3 WAR into the 5 WAR range... Make some minor upgrades (Cameron?), hope that Freese pans out, and that leaves you with an 85 win team on paper, or a dead copy of what we had in '08.


Understand that I'm not really arguing with you, just exploring it myself. I think that Holliday + Smoltz + the same club mentioned about (sans Cameron) and we're at 88 wins, which is more than acceptable entering the season.

User avatar
Eephus Speed
All-Star
Posts: 1642
Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Eephus Speed »

Fat Strat wrote:If the Yankees are out of the discussion then I will honestly say that there is NO REASON why we don't win the competition for him. The # of teams that can throw big money his direction is limited to a handful.
The reason could be Holliday deciding he'd prefer to play for one of those other clubs. Boston (if they let Bay go), LAA, Atlanta or San Fran. To name several.
Fat Strat wrote:Make some minor upgrades (Cameron?), hope that Freese pans out, and that leaves you with an 85 win team on paper, or a dead copy of what we had in '08.
And with Bay? What, 86 wins? 87? Every win counts, but they come at a price...that price needs to be remotely reasonable. And will Bay age well? What's he worth 2 or 3 years from now?

How you feel about Ludwick beyond 2010 (sentiments I share with you) is how I feel about Bay beyond 2010. If Bay would sign for 1 year and $10-12M, I'd be all for it if we can't re-sign Holliday. But that ain't gonna happen.
Fat Strat wrote:You're also jettisoning DeRosa and Holliday's production which, imo, had a larger positive impact on the club than their replacements had negative.
Well, thanks to injuries and maybe some bad luck, DeRosa was only worth 0.4 WAR between the time of the trade and season's end.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Jocephus »

According to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the Mets have begun discussions with free agent outfielder Matt Holliday.

Mets GM Omar Minaya met with Holliday's agent, Scott Boras, for about 45 minutes Tuesday night. The club might not have enough money in the end to land the highly coveted outfielder, but they're going to try. "We need a left fielder and two of the best are in the [free-agent] market," one Mets executive said. "We are not doing our jobs if we don’t look into it."
Source: New York Post
Related: Mets

User avatar
epinephrine
Veteran Player
Posts: 772
Joined: August 4 09, 9:24 pm
Location: 815, IL

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by epinephrine »

It sure sounds to me like Holliday picked the wrong year to be a FA, but I am no psychic. If the Yankees don't throw a Teixeira-esque contract at him, then he is not getting it from anyone else.

User avatar
number9
Veteran Player
Posts: 998
Joined: April 18 06, 10:31 pm
Location: Saint Louis

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by number9 »

MLB - Mozeliak meets with Holliday's agent.
11/11/09 @ 7:33:53 am

CHICAGO - Cardinals general manager John Mozeliak met with agent Scott Boras Tuesday at the general manager's meetings in Chicago, according to the "Post-Dispatch."

The hour-long sitdown centered around free agent outfielder Matt Holliday, whom the Cardinals have expressed a desire to re-sign after he was acquired in a mid-season trade with the Oakland A's. Boras, known for getting maximum value for his star free agents, continued his comparison of Holliday to Yankees first baseman Mark Teixeira, who inked an eight-year $180-million deal last offfseason en route to a World Series title with New York this season.

Boras discounted any notion the Cardinals can't afford that kind of committment to Holliday as a mid-market club, citing the team's attendance in excess of 3.3-million this past season.

Mozeliak also expressed interest in other Boras clients, including free agent outfielder Xavier Nady. The Cards have exclusive negotiating rights with Holliday until November 20th, when other teams can then make formal offers.
Link

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Jocephus »

Adam Wainwright told 1380 KSLG in St. Louis Wednesday that he believes Matt Holliday will return to St. Louis for the 2010 season and beyond.

"I think he'll be back," Wainwright told the morning radio program. "I know Matt, know his family, and know he wants to back. It's going to take a perfect situation to get him to leave." The comments, if valid, won't sit well with Holliday's agent, Scott Boras, who is trying to get baseball's biggest spenders involved with the free agent outfielder. If Holliday is looking for the most lucrative deal, he's not likely to find it in St. Louis. But if he's truly happy in the environment and hopes to stay, he can always call off the dogs and sign for a contract that will, either way, be fairly handsome.
Source: KSLG 1380

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Fat Strat »

So far that's two players who have publicly said that Holliday wants to return to the Cards. That means exactly squat but who knows, but at least it's something.

User avatar
Fan_In_NY
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5404
Joined: April 18 06, 7:22 pm
Location: Birthplace of Baseball- Hoboken, NJ

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Fan_In_NY »

epinephrine wrote:It sure sounds to me like Holliday picked the wrong year to be a FA, but I am no psychic. If the Yankees don't throw a Teixeira-esque contract at him, then he is not getting it from anyone else.
The Red Sox have about 40-50 Million to play with to try and bolster their team after seeing their rivals win the World Series. The Mets have a complete mess on the field and their cross-city rivals just won a World Series, and the Angels just cleared a bunch of money with Vlad coming off their books and have free agents in Lackey (who's spot they can fill internally) and Figgins so they need to find replacement production from. There are plenty of teams in the running for Holliday, in fact I think this is a great year for him to be a free agent. the only thing that would have made it better would be if the economy was flying high.

Locked