lol that's probably pretty true.Leroy wrote:=$omaha_red wrote:perfect situation
Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27559
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
- Eephus Speed
- All-Star
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
So he signs for around 18-20 million a year...I think that's what most people have him pegged at. I think I said 5yr/90m at the beginning...my guess is the Cards go as high as 6yr/110-115m.withAloe wrote:FWIW: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.ph ... s-teixeira
I still think he ends up a Card.
-
Fat Strat
- Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
- Posts: 28010
- Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
- Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
There's so much about that article that I could take issue with. Personally I don't think that Holliday will sign "for 10 to 15 percent less than what Teixeira got, because teams are also a bit skeptical of unadjusted National League numbers". I don't doubt that he could sign for slightly less money but saying that he will BECAUSE teams are skeptical of some still unaccounted for difference between stats procured in the AL vs. NL is ludicrous. I mean, have we ever seen a player get less money just because he played in the NL? Have we seen a player get more money beacuse he played in the AL?withAloe wrote:FWIW: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.ph ... s-teixeira
As much as I love fangraphs (and I do love it) this is the type of overanalyzed "statyness" that drives the rest of the baseball community bonkers. IF Holliday gets 10-15% less than Teixera it will be because of a variety of market conditions, the teams involved in the bidding, etc. and most likely have absolutely nothing to do with how the league feels about the adjustments for league that aren't yet built into WAR. Heck, if Texeria had a twin clone on the market today there's no guarantee that he would get within 10-15% of what the real Tiexera got last year.
- Eephus Speed
- All-Star
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
I agree. While MLB clubs might be increasingly SABR-friendly, I don't think league variance is what will determine the difference between Holliday's contract and Teixeira's.
And I expect Holliday to get more than 10-15% less, unless he signs with the Yankees. 30-40% is more like it.
And I expect Holliday to get more than 10-15% less, unless he signs with the Yankees. 30-40% is more like it.
-
Jocephus
- 99% conan clips
- Posts: 64992
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Joe Strauss of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Cardinals general manager John Mozeliak doesn't want to enter a bidding war for Matt Holliday.
"I think it's fair to say when we present an offer, that's pretty much going to be our position," Mozeliak said. "We're not really interested in becoming involved in a long, drawn-out back-and-forth." Mozeliak met with Scott Boras during the general manager meetings in Chicago this week, but plans to have a face-to-face meeting with Holliday in the very near future. If the process gets drawn out, Mozeliak is prepared to move on with alternatives, including fortifying the starting rotation.
Source: St Louis Post-Dispatch
- omaha_red
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12963
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
- Location: toning it done
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
nice knowin' ya, MattJocephus wrote:Joe Strauss of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Cardinals general manager John Mozeliak doesn't want to enter a bidding war for Matt Holliday.
"I think it's fair to say when we present an offer, that's pretty much going to be our position," Mozeliak said. "We're not really interested in becoming involved in a long, drawn-out back-and-forth." Mozeliak met with Scott Boras during the general manager meetings in Chicago this week, but plans to have a face-to-face meeting with Holliday in the very near future. If the process gets drawn out, Mozeliak is prepared to move on with alternatives, including fortifying the starting rotation.
Source: St Louis Post-Dispatch
- clevername
- Bringer of FRBG
- Posts: 10380
- Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
would Xavier Nady + John Lackey be > Matt Holliday?
Not that we would actually go get Lackey.
Not that we would actually go get Lackey.
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27559
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
fortifying the starting rotation?
That sounds made up. You have two aces (albeit one fragile one) and Kyle Lohse. The Cardinals have rarely entered a season with 5 reliable starters.
That sounds made up. You have two aces (albeit one fragile one) and Kyle Lohse. The Cardinals have rarely entered a season with 5 reliable starters.
-
Fat Strat
- Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
- Posts: 28010
- Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
- Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
If the Cards can't get Holliday and Bay resigns then they will have to do something to improve the club. Don't forget that we have 2 rotation spots open. We have to sign at least one starter and could easily sign two.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:fortifying the starting rotation?
That sounds made up. You have two aces (albeit one fragile one) and Kyle Lohse. The Cardinals have rarely entered a season with 5 reliable starters.


