Posted: February 26 07, 12:17 am
you're just being hurtful...Hungary Jack wrote:This place is starting to look like CT.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
you're just being hurtful...Hungary Jack wrote:This place is starting to look like CT.
2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.The Third Man wrote:Okay 2 for 14. That's .143. The point still stands.
I knew that would eventually happen. lol.vinsanity wrote:2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.The Third Man wrote:Okay 2 for 14. That's .143. The point still stands.
I'll take it.
If we had to list all of the hitters Marquis has never gotten out, we might be here a while.Transmogrified Tiger wrote: On the point of the thread, Marquis has never gotten Pujols out. 3 for 3 with 3 singles.
Hmm somebody posting the actual line?bronx_bird wrote:I knew that would eventually happen. lol.vinsanity wrote:2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.The Third Man wrote:Okay 2 for 14. That's .143. The point still stands.
I'll take it.
yeah, it's amazing what actual stats can tell us. thanks for finding that. so, he's had at least one hit in the postseason, too. And at least two GW hits total off Lidge in a handful of at bats. I'm still going to say, if you have a couple of GW hits off a dominant closer in a relatively small number of at bats....and one of them was legendary....I'd say that falls into the "owned" category.vinsanity wrote:Hmm somebody posting the actual line?bronx_bird wrote:I knew that would eventually happen. lol.vinsanity wrote:2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.The Third Man wrote:Okay 2 for 14. That's .143. The point still stands.
I'll take it.
I think that's just regular season though...
bronx_bird wrote:ignorance is bliss. bliss, I say.Centreville wrote:pardon my ignorance, but what are you talking about ?Hungary Jack wrote:This place is starting to look like CT.
ESPN has him at 3 for 13, 1 2B, 1 BB, and 3 K's. I'm pretty sure that's career regular season, since it says 0 HR's. I think the 2 for 5 is just 2006.vinsanity wrote:Hmm somebody posting the actual line?bronx_bird wrote:I knew that would eventually happen. lol.vinsanity wrote:2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.The Third Man wrote:Okay 2 for 14. That's .143. The point still stands.
I'll take it.
I think that's just regular season though...
There's a chance my line is from last year. Buuut add that end to nearly ruining a kid's career with a HR that is probably still in orbit around the world...seems like some pownage to me.Popeye_Card wrote:ESPN has him at 3 for 13, 1 2B, 1 BB, and 3 K's. I'm pretty sure that's career regular season, since it says 0 HR's. I think the 2 for 5 is just 2006.vinsanity wrote:2/5 1 K, .400 Avg, .400 OBP, .600 SLG, 1.000 OPS.
I'll take it.
--P--