Page 41 of 103
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 1:40 pm
by TimeForGuinness
phinstd wrote:lukethedrifter wrote:phinstd wrote:FWIW, while I do think it's cyclical, I agree that the A-10 is presently a better conference than the MVC.
but the question is, is it a better conf for SLU?
well, at least that's the question for SLU fans.
I'd have to say no...there are just too many negatives, and unless one is willing to state that the MVC = not a strong conference, that cancels out one of the positives for the A-10.
With all due repsect to Majerus, the only reason the MVC would be excited to take on SLU is because of the market.
The team isn't very good, and is only decent in basketball and soccer (that I know of). The MVC would gladly take them, but due to business reasons more than performance reasons.
Huh?
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 1:59 pm
by lukethedrifter
TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:lukethedrifter wrote:phinstd wrote:FWIW, while I do think it's cyclical, I agree that the A-10 is presently a better conference than the MVC.
but the question is, is it a better conf for SLU?
well, at least that's the question for SLU fans.
I'd have to say no...there are just too many negatives, and unless one is willing to state that the MVC = not a strong conference, that cancels out one of the positives for the A-10.
With all due repsect to Majerus, the only reason the MVC would be excited to take on SLU is because of the market.
The team isn't very good, and is only decent in basketball and soccer (that I know of). The MVC would gladly take them, but due to business reasons more than performance reasons.
Huh?
Yeah, I was thinking the post made no sense myself.
The nearest A10 teams are Dayton and Xavier, I believe. 350 something miles and Illinois and Indiana away. The next nearest A10 team is what? Richmond? Charlotte? Some team in Pittsburgh?
That's the issue. Academically and in setting the A10 schools are very like SLU, urban and private. But is that enough to overcome the extreme distances?
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:02 pm
by phins
lukethedrifter wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:lukethedrifter wrote:phinstd wrote:FWIW, while I do think it's cyclical, I agree that the A-10 is presently a better conference than the MVC.
but the question is, is it a better conf for SLU?
well, at least that's the question for SLU fans.
I'd have to say no...there are just too many negatives, and unless one is willing to state that the MVC = not a strong conference, that cancels out one of the positives for the A-10.
With all due repsect to Majerus, the only reason the MVC would be excited to take on SLU is because of the market.
The team isn't very good, and is only decent in basketball and soccer (that I know of). The MVC would gladly take them, but due to business reasons more than performance reasons.
Huh?
Yeah, I was thinking the post made no sense myself.
The nearest A10 teams are Dayton and Xavier, I believe. 350 something miles and Illinois and Indiana away. The next nearest A10 team is what? Richmond? Charlotte? Some team in Pittsburgh?
That's the issue. Academically and in setting the A10 schools are very like SLU, urban and private. But is that enough to overcome the extreme distances?
The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:04 pm
by TimeForGuinness
phinstd wrote:The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
Go see how many Juniors and Seniors they have on their team. If they finish strong, I think they land in the NIT...maybe the NCAA depending on how many A10 teams they take.
This team is just getting started.
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:07 pm
by lukethedrifter
phinstd wrote:lukethedrifter wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:lukethedrifter wrote:phinstd wrote:FWIW, while I do think it's cyclical, I agree that the A-10 is presently a better conference than the MVC.
but the question is, is it a better conf for SLU?
well, at least that's the question for SLU fans.
I'd have to say no...there are just too many negatives, and unless one is willing to state that the MVC = not a strong conference, that cancels out one of the positives for the A-10.
With all due repsect to Majerus, the only reason the MVC would be excited to take on SLU is because of the market.
The team isn't very good, and is only decent in basketball and soccer (that I know of). The MVC would gladly take them, but due to business reasons more than performance reasons.
Huh?
Yeah, I was thinking the post made no sense myself.
The nearest A10 teams are Dayton and Xavier, I believe. 350 something miles and Illinois and Indiana away. The next nearest A10 team is what? Richmond? Charlotte? Some team in Pittsburgh?
That's the issue. Academically and in setting the A10 schools are very like SLU, urban and private. But is that enough to overcome the extreme distances?
The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
I think you're wrong. Nonetheless, when forming an athletic conference do you just look at how good a team (the teams) is currently?
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:26 pm
by TimeForGuinness
TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
Go see how many Juniors and Seniors they have on their team. If they finish strong, I think they land in the NIT...maybe the NCAA depending on how many A10 teams they take.
This team is just getting started.
Plus, I'll add that if they didn't lose 2 games in OT...they'd be 8-1 in conference (leading the A10) and 17-6 overall.
BTW, their team is all Freshmen and Sophomores.
Kwamain Mitchell is a beast.
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:37 pm
by lukethedrifter
TimeForGuinness wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
Go see how many Juniors and Seniors they have on their team. If they finish strong, I think they land in the NIT...maybe the NCAA depending on how many A10 teams they take.
This team is just getting started.
Plus, I'll add that if they didn't lose 2 games in OT...they'd be 8-1 in conference (leading the A10) and 17-6 overall.
BTW, their team is all Freshmen and Sophomores.
Kwamain Mitchell is a beast.
all true but don't see what this has to do with whether A10 or MVC is better conference fit.
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:41 pm
by TimeForGuinness
lukethedrifter wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:phinstd wrote:The basketball team isn't really any good, and their program is only decent in basketball and soccer. I'm not sure of any other sports they're any good in. Add the word "SLU, before is and it flows better.
Go see how many Juniors and Seniors they have on their team. If they finish strong, I think they land in the NIT...maybe the NCAA depending on how many A10 teams they take.
This team is just getting started.
Plus, I'll add that if they didn't lose 2 games in OT...they'd be 8-1 in conference (leading the A10) and 17-6 overall.
BTW, their team is all Freshmen and Sophomores.
Kwamain Mitchell is a beast.
all true but don't see what this has to do with whether A10 or MVC is better conference fit.
Geographically, the MVC is a better fit...local rivals with Missouri State, Creighton, and SIUC.
But I think the A10 is a stronger better conference with Xavier, Dayton, Temple, Rhode Island...I don't expect Richmond & Charlotte to hang on very long.
This whole mess makes me miss Conference USA.
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:47 pm
by lukethedrifter
TimeForGuinness wrote:
Geographically, the MVC is a better fit...local rivals with Missouri State, Creighton, and SIUC.
But I think the A10 is a stronger better conference with Xavier, Dayton, Temple, Rhode Island...I don't expect Richmond & Charlotte to hang on very long.
This whole mess makes me miss Conference USA.
Then I repeat:
The nearest A10 teams are Dayton and Xavier, I believe. 350 something miles and Illinois and Indiana away. The next nearest A10 team is what? Richmond? Charlotte? Some team in Pittsburgh?
That's the issue. Academically and in setting the A10 schools are very like SLU, urban and private. But is that enough to overcome the extreme distances?
Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread
Posted: February 12 10, 2:50 pm
by TimeForGuinness
lukethedrifter wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:
Geographically, the MVC is a better fit...local rivals with Missouri State, Creighton, and SIUC.
But I think the A10 is a stronger better conference with Xavier, Dayton, Temple, Rhode Island...I don't expect Richmond & Charlotte to hang on very long.
This whole mess makes me miss Conference USA.
Then I repeat:
The nearest A10 teams are Dayton and Xavier, I believe. 350 something miles and Illinois and Indiana away. The next nearest A10 team is what? Richmond? Charlotte? Some team in Pittsburgh?
That's the issue. Academically and in setting the A10 schools are very like SLU, urban and private. But is that enough to overcome the extreme distances?
Sorry, I guess I never did answer your question exactly. I'll take the A10.
It's worth the travel, IMHO.