2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21898
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

Texas has lost 6 of their last 9 games. Hopefully last night was the dagger that drops them out fo the top 25. I think that would be delightful.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 11825
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by phins »

lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by JL21 »

The beauty of the Mike Anderson system is that when everything clicks, they look unbeatable. It's breathtaking to watch.

And yes, barring a totally stupid collapse against Nebraska, Colorado, and Iowa State, that win last night should lock them into the tournament. Now they're just playing for position. A win against K-State or KU, plus a good showing in the Big XII tourney, would probably get them a 5 seed or something.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

phinstd wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.
Yea...we still have to face Xavier (@ SLU), Temple (@ SLU), and Dayton (@ Dayton), though.

If we can beat 1 of those 3, I think we're a lock for the NIT and maybe a bubble NCAA depending on how we fair during the A10 tourney.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37257
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

JL21 wrote:The beauty of the Mike Anderson system is that when everything clicks, they look unbeatable. It's breathtaking to watch.
That it is.

I think Longfellow said it best

There was a little girl,
Who had a little curl,
Right in the middle of her forehead.
When she was good,
She was very good indeed,
But when she was bad she was horrid


What I can't decide is if MU has poor shooters and rebounders or if The System at times leads to poor shooting and rebounding. That game last night was a pretty good example. The Tigers completely took Texas out of its game and could have won by 15 or 20.
I'm not complaining about the win. I love it. Just interested in taking a look at the good and the bad of the MA system.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37257
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
phinstd wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.
Yea...we still have to face Xavier (@ SLU), Temple (@ SLU), and Dayton (@ Dayton), though.

If we can beat 1 of those 3, I think we're a lock for the NIT and maybe a bubble NCAA depending on how we fair during the A10 tourney.
With the A10 RPI, win 2 of those and a couple of tourney games and the Selection Committee will give the Bills a real hard look. Consider what they've said in the past about giving more weight to the team as currently constructed (see: Cody Ellis) and late season play.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by JL21 »

I think the system definitely leads to poor rebounding. Last year, they had very capable guys on the boards- Lyons and Carroll- and I can't find the team stats, but IIRC, they were outrebounded plenty along the way.

The shooting, on the other hand... I think this team just doesn't shoot well. And CMA will sacrifice offense for defense, so defense-first guys like Tiller and Ramsey get more minutes than they probably should. Also, I think part of that is experience. As English and Denmon and Paul get more playing time under their belt, I imagine they'll stop taking as many ill-advised shots.

User avatar
BW23
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12896
Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by BW23 »

phinstd wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.
Heard anything on Porter's status? I know he applied for the medical redshirt, but I haven't heard a timeline or anything.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 11825
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by phins »

BW23 wrote:
phinstd wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.
Heard anything on Porter's status? I know he applied for the medical redshirt, but I haven't heard a timeline or anything.
He'll get the redshirt without problem. He's back to healthy enough to play, but it would be foolish to do so now.

I'd much rather have him at 23 as a 5th year senior, when we'll be further into our rebuilding phase than this year anyway.

User avatar
BW23
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12896
Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm

Re: 2009-2010 NCCA Basketball thread

Post by BW23 »

phinstd wrote:
BW23 wrote:
phinstd wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Oh, and SLU won again beating Rhode Island.
Big ups to them....making me look bad there.
Heard anything on Porter's status? I know he applied for the medical redshirt, but I haven't heard a timeline or anything.
He'll get the redshirt without problem. He's back to healthy enough to play, but it would be foolish to do so now.

I'd much rather have him at 23 as a 5th year senior, when we'll be further into our rebuilding phase than this year anyway.
I know his HS coaches talk to him a couple of times a week, plus his brother is on the team, but I hadn't asked them lately. Thanks for the reply.

And he'll only be 22, not 23 ;)

Okay, hopefully 23 by his last game played (March birthday).

Post Reply