Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Lesson »

Fat_Bulldog wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 10:19 am
How bad is this team though? What if they had only lost half of the 21 saves they had blown? Or say, only 5 or 6 of them?
Their pythagorean record is 46-50. I don't think their true talent is 10+ games below .500, but is probably closer to being +/- 4-5 games from .500, which isn't great.

User avatar
Famous Mortimer
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3960
Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
Location: Cherokee

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Famous Mortimer »

Fat_Bulldog wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 10:19 am
How bad is this team though? What if they had only lost half of the 21 saves they had blown? Or say, only 5 or 6 of them?
Bad enough to blow 21 saves, definitely

dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25480
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by dmarx114 »

Fat_Bulldog wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 10:19 am
How bad is this team though? What if they had only lost half of the 21 saves they had blown? Or say, only 5 or 6 of them?
They lost 6 times leading after 8, 3 of which were with 2 outs.

Countless other games were lost in the 7th, 8th, and extra innings as well.

33-29 over last 62.

The bullpen cost us this season (and yes, Mo deserves blame for this).

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Lesson »

dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 11:13 am

They lost 6 times leading after 8, 3 of which were with 2 outs.

Countless other games were lost in the 7th, 8th, and extra innings as well.

33-29 over last 62.

The bullpen cost us this season (and yes, Mo deserves blame for this).
33-29 still isn't that good, though. That's barely above .500 and extrapolated across an entire season is an 86 win pace.

April was a cluster [expletive] exacerbated by the team's best hitters not hitting while the pitching was its absolute worst. The pitching still isn't good but the hitting is better.

dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25480
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by dmarx114 »

Lesson wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 11:18 am
dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 11:13 am

They lost 6 times leading after 8, 3 of which were with 2 outs.

Countless other games were lost in the 7th, 8th, and extra innings as well.

33-29 over last 62.

The bullpen cost us this season (and yes, Mo deserves blame for this).
33-29 still isn't that good, though. That's barely above .500 and extrapolated across an entire season is an 86 win pace.

April was a cluster [expletive] exacerbated by the team's best hitters not hitting while the pitching was its absolute worst. The pitching still isn't good but the hitting is better.
I didn't say it was good. I was responding to the poster that was (rightfully) questioning just how "bad" this team actually was.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24278
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

Fat_Bulldog wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 10:19 am
How bad is this team though? What if they had only lost half of the 21 saves they had blown? Or say, only 5 or 6 of them?
Exactly. You can blame all our woes on the horrendous back end reliever corps. Not that the middle has been much better. How many leads have we blown before a save chance? Is that tracked anywhere?

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62389
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Radbird »

Patience required as Mo works his magic.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Jarred Kelenic broke his foot kicking a water cooler yesterday so maybe the Mariners really, really want an outfielder now.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18098
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Magneto2.0 »

https://theathletic.com/4704073/2023/07 ... ine-deals/

Article going over potential Yankees and Cardinals trades, since they both make logical sense for each other. Aside from Carlson, also Brendan Donovan and Nootbaar were both mentioned as players the Yankees would be interested in and even though the Cardinals would like to keep them and consider them part of their core (Specifically Nootbaar). And said it would take a haul to get Nootbaar or Donovan from the Cardinals.

But she said ultimately their desperation for pitching need may win out, and they're going to have to part with pieces they didn't want to. And the Yankees desperately need hitting, so they may cave to demands.
Last edited by Magneto2.0 on July 20 23, 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cardsfantx
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12205
Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by cardsfantx »

Radbird wrote: ↑
July 20 23, 12:25 pm
Patience required as Mo works his magic.
I was just joking about signing Lawrence MO!

Post Reply