Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Endorsment deals for New York are much more substantial than doing the occasional spot on KSDK for Auto Tire, so I'm thinking that much of that COLA stuff pretty much works itself out. All things being equal money wise, I'd have to seriously consider the Yankees over any other team in baseball because I'd seriously want to win a world series, and that's the place to go for that.
- clevername
- Bringer of FRBG
- Posts: 10380
- Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
The Mets are reportedly now in on Bay. The more interest in Bay the worse things are for our hopes for Holliday.
I'm much more worried about the Red Sox signing Holliday than the Yankees.
I'm much more worried about the Red Sox signing Holliday than the Yankees.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
And the Giants are officialy out for both of them....... Rotoworld:clevername wrote:The Mets are reportedly now in on Bay. The more interest in Bay the worse things are for our hopes for Holliday.
I'm much more worried about the Red Sox signing Holliday than the Yankees.
Edit: I see it's already been posted.........sorry.Giants general manager Brian Sabean said the Giants won't be in on free agent outfielders Matt Holliday and Jason Bay, FOXSports.com reports.
"They're beyond our limits," Sabean said. "We don't have the wherewithal to pay them the dollars they want." That likely takes at least one team out of the running for two of the offseason's most-coveted bats, but the Red Sox, Mets, Cardinals, Mariners and Yankees are expected to bid on corner outfielders before the winter is done.
Source: FOXSports.com
Related: Jason Bay
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Actually Brian, you do have the "wherewithal" to pay them. You just wasted that "wherewithal" on guys like Barry Zito.Socnorb11 wrote:And the Giants are officialy out for both of them....... Rotoworld:clevername wrote:The Mets are reportedly now in on Bay. The more interest in Bay the worse things are for our hopes for Holliday.
I'm much more worried about the Red Sox signing Holliday than the Yankees.
Edit: I see it's already been posted.........sorry.Giants general manager Brian Sabean said the Giants won't be in on free agent outfielders Matt Holliday and Jason Bay, FOXSports.com reports.
"They're beyond our limits," Sabean said. "We don't have the wherewithal to pay them the dollars they want." That likely takes at least one team out of the running for two of the offseason's most-coveted bats, but the Red Sox, Mets, Cardinals, Mariners and Yankees are expected to bid on corner outfielders before the winter is done.
Source: FOXSports.com
Related: Jason Bay
-
Jocephus
- 99% conan clips
- Posts: 64992
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Jon Heyman of SI.com reports that the Mets offered free agent outfielder Jason Bay a four-year contract worth roughly $65 million.
Bay turned down a similar contract from the Red Sox before hitting free agency, so the Mets would likely need to kick in another year to get a deal done. Interestingly, Heyman writes that the Mets didn't want to get into "protracted talks" for Matt Holliday, who could make up to $100 million this winter. The Mets are confident that Bay's pull-hitting style will translate to Citi Field, so it looks like they've finally made their preference known. Stay tuned.
Source: Jon Heyman on Twitter
Related: Mets
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30811
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
Based on what we've seen from DeWitt, I don't feel like he's given Boras any reason to think that would work. Boras tried this kind of stuff with Weaver, as I recall. Actually that may have been after he left. I recall something like "the thing Cardinals fans need to know is that Weaver wanted to stay.."Michael wrote:Boras shamed McCourt in to giving Manny an extra year.ghostrunner wrote:So DeWitt's going to be shamed into spending more? No way that's the case. I'd assume if anything, it makes them less likely to deal with him.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote: His job, pure and simple, is to get the most money as possible for his clients. How he chooses to do that is his business. If this gets an extra mil/year for Holliday (and therefore 100K for himself), I would say that criticizing the Cardinals is his job.
Like I said earlier, now that teams are better at valuating players, Boras' new tactic is shaming owners. My guess is he's hoping the Card's set the market then the Yankees come in at the last minute and top it.
Here's all I could find, and this is situation where Weaver is already with Seattle. No benefit to Boras other than perhaps to make St. Louis' frugality look bad.
Good writeup from DanUp over at VEB:
But Scott Boras knows who the Cardinals are, and he knows that the Cardinals understand as much about his product as he does. I'm not sure what saying "you sure look like you can afford him!" to the press does, except earn him a small but devoted following among the comments sections of America's newspapers.
That Matt Holliday will eventually be an "owner's decision" is self-evident. Bill DeWallet (it's a pun) could spend money he does not want to spend on the Cardinals on Matt Holliday; it's within his means......
Having watched some of the better blogs rage against the continued employment of, say, Bill Bavasi for so long, I can only say that I'm glad the Cardinals have had reasonably competent management for the entirety of my blogging tenure. This particular Boras trick seems so transparent and desperate that I can only assume, in the grand tradition of trading with Billy Beane, that he is doing it on purpose, as part of an elaborate series of feints. But at least Mozeliak's unlikely to fall for the initial pump-fake.
- haltz
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22630
- Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
- Location: a proud midwestern metropolis
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
holy [expletive], this is awesome.not signing Jeff Weaver is how you don’t win divisions
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
You absolutely beat me to it. I literally laughed out loud when I read that.haltz wrote:holy [expletive], this is awesome.not signing Jeff Weaver is how you don’t win divisions
-
Freed Roger
- Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
- Posts: 26073
- Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
every damn day Boras is front page in PD. They've become the shill for him.
I'm curious if the Post Dispatch will get commission check from Boras once Holliday gets signed by someone.
I'm curious if the Post Dispatch will get commission check from Boras once Holliday gets signed by someone.
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread
ghostrunner wrote:Based on what we've seen from DeWitt, I don't feel like he's given Boras any reason to think that would work. Boras tried this kind of stuff with Weaver, as I recall. Actually that may have been after he left. I recall something like "the thing Cardinals fans need to know is that Weaver wanted to stay.."
I agree, my only point is shamming owners is now Boras' best tactic, and it's worked in the past, so he's going to use it. I don't think DeWitt is going to fall for the pressure. Holliday didn't lead us to the WS. Only Jeff Weaver has that magic.


