I think he means that the faulty voting machine that causes the hanging chads is still in mothballs in a warehouse in Altoona...Arthur Dent wrote:Since when is the Democratic Voting Machine not geared up? The PA "trend" towards McCain is small and late and Obama already has decent lead there. Maybe the polls are totally wrong, but I have not heard a credible story for why that would be the case.BenNX74205 wrote:Pennsylvania is trending red, and the Democratic Voting Machine isn't geared up for this election.
Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
- Hungary Jack
- Mother Earth
- Posts: 19536
- Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
- Location: In Cognito
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
- PujolJunkie
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 10370
- Joined: March 22 07, 4:54 pm
- Location: north county, stl
- Contact:
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
I've already outlined the fact that Real Clear Politics' averages were completely, around 95%, spot on in 2004. It got 2 states wrong. One that was never polled, Hawaii, and Wisconsin. Two. Go look now. It's gonna end up that way or very close. Obama 300> EV and McCain will lose Pennsylvania. It's just not gonna happen.BenNX74205 wrote:I don't know about "percentage bluer" or "bluer than the nation." I don't really know what that means, and I didn't know it counted in an election.PujolJunkie wrote:I wouldn't be so positive of that.BenNX74205 wrote:Obama will not win Pennsylvania by 6 points. Put it on the board.PujolJunkie wrote:A Hayes Research poll just came out giving McCain just a 3 point lead in Alaska. Definitely an outlier, but funny to look at none the less.
EDIT: by the way, the supposed Pennsylvania tightening? It tightened to a 6 or 7 point Obama lead. Moderate Republicans came home to roost for McCain and he gained independents. It's still bluer than the nation by 3 or 4%.
It was 5% bluer than the rest of the Nation when Kerry won it. 6 isn't a stretch.
What I do know is that Gore won PA by 3.5% in 2000 and Kerry won PA by 2.5%. Pennsylvania is trending red, and the Democratic Voting Machine isn't geared up for this election.
What is so different between Ohio and Pennsylvania that OH is dead even and PA is a big Obama win? I'm telling you guys, these polls don't look like they're adding up to me. Yeah I could be wrong, and it's not like I'm pulling for McCain here. But I think a lot of people are going to be surprised how close this election is going to be.
If it was within the MoE%, you'd have a point. But PA is a 4 to 8 point win for Obama.
-
planet planet
- http://tinyurl.com/2e4x5hy
- Posts: 24904
- Joined: April 15 06, 6:25 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
What happens to the Obama campaign's surplus $?
-
Arthur Dent
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12530
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:43 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
It looks like they even got Hawaii right.PujolJunkie wrote:I've already outlined the fact that Real Clear Politics' averages were completely, around 95%, spot on in 2004. It got 2 states wrong. One that was never polled, Hawaii
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presid ... CP_EC.html
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
Incumbant president most unpopular in the history of polling with an unpopular war and an economy in the tank. McCain was the best shot.BW23 wrote:You don't really believe that.jim wrote:I agree Mary.Mary1966 wrote:Who will they say it should have been? Romney? None of the other Republican candidates IMO could have done better than McCain.Richie Allen wrote:I said just yesterday that I'd give the right wing (Fox/Limbaugh.Hannity, etc...) a week before they jump on the "I told you all along it shouldn't have been McCain..."BW23 wrote:Ah, Fred. What could have been.....sighyoung wrote:A palliative: http://griffinroomblog.blogspot.com/200 ... chair.htmlBW23 wrote:That darn GOP.
- KyCardinalFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5520
- Joined: May 31 06, 3:16 pm
- Location: Western Kentucky
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
I think Romney would've done better in an election about the economy. However, when the candidates were selected during the primaries I'm sure most voting then thought this would be about national security and Iraq.jim wrote:Incumbant president most unpopular in the history of polling with an unpopular war and an economy in the tank. McCain was the best shot.BW23 wrote:You don't really believe that.jim wrote:I agree Mary.Mary1966 wrote:Who will they say it should have been? Romney? None of the other Republican candidates IMO could have done better than McCain.Richie Allen wrote:I said just yesterday that I'd give the right wing (Fox/Limbaugh.Hannity, etc...) a week before they jump on the "I told you all along it shouldn't have been McCain..."BW23 wrote:Ah, Fred. What could have been.....sighyoung wrote:A palliative: http://griffinroomblog.blogspot.com/200 ... chair.htmlBW23 wrote:That darn GOP.
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
Mormon, right? Would they accept that?KyCardinalFan wrote:I think Romney would've done better in an election about the economy. However, when the candidates were selected during the primaries I'm sure most voting then thought this would be about national security and Iraq.jim wrote:Incumbant president most unpopular in the history of polling with an unpopular war and an economy in the tank. McCain was the best shot.BW23 wrote:You don't really believe that.jim wrote:I agree Mary.Mary1966 wrote:Who will they say it should have been? Romney? None of the other Republican candidates IMO could have done better than McCain.Richie Allen wrote:I said just yesterday that I'd give the right wing (Fox/Limbaugh.Hannity, etc...) a week before they jump on the "I told you all along it shouldn't have been McCain..."BW23 wrote:Ah, Fred. What could have been.....sighyoung wrote:A palliative: http://griffinroomblog.blogspot.com/200 ... chair.htmlBW23 wrote:That darn GOP.
- UK
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4263
- Joined: December 10 06, 6:41 pm
- Location: Baseball Purgatory.
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
McCain had an opportunity to separate himself from Bush but he gambled on locking down the conservative base 1st and foremost and then counting on those who supported him in '00 when he ran the against neo-conservative ideologies of GWB.
Between underestimating the shift of undecided to the left, an awful run campaign, some gaffes (fundamentals being strong), Palin backlash from the left and independents, etc., the only who likely could've did better was Romney. The best combo would've been McCain/Romney but they went for disenchanted Clinton supporters with Palin and it hasn't worked.
Between underestimating the shift of undecided to the left, an awful run campaign, some gaffes (fundamentals being strong), Palin backlash from the left and independents, etc., the only who likely could've did better was Romney. The best combo would've been McCain/Romney but they went for disenchanted Clinton supporters with Palin and it hasn't worked.
- KyCardinalFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5520
- Joined: May 31 06, 3:16 pm
- Location: Western Kentucky
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
So will Missouri keep it's reputation of voting for nearly every president?
- UK
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4263
- Joined: December 10 06, 6:41 pm
- Location: Baseball Purgatory.
Re: Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin
It'll be close, but I think MO is going red while Obama wins the election.KyCardinalFan wrote:So will Missouri keep it's reputation of voting for nearly every president?


