Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
epinephrine
Veteran Player
Posts: 772
Joined: August 4 09, 9:24 pm
Location: 815, IL

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by epinephrine »

Jocephus wrote:
Jon Heyman of SI.com reports that the Mets offered free agent outfielder Jason Bay a four-year contract worth roughly $65 million.
Bay turned down a similar contract from the Red Sox before hitting free agency, so the Mets would likely need to kick in another year to get a deal done. Interestingly, Heyman writes that the Mets didn't want to get into "protracted talks" for Matt Holliday, who could make up to $100 million this winter. The Mets are confident that Bay's pull-hitting style will translate to Citi Field, so it looks like they've finally made their preference known. Stay tuned.
Source: Jon Heyman on Twitter
Related: Mets
The market for left-fielders is on an absolute tear....

User avatar
Radio_Bugtussle
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3450
Joined: July 26 06, 9:51 am
Location: Searching for the perfect microbrew

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Radio_Bugtussle »

Michael wrote:
I agree, my only point is shamming owners is now Boras' best tactic, and it's worked in the past, so he's going to use it. I don't think DeWitt is going to fall for the pressure.
I'm with you. Current ownership has a pretty decent track record in getting deals done with this slimeball. Looks like DeWitt ignores the bluster and whining pretty well.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Radio_Bugtussle wrote:
Michael wrote:
I agree, my only point is shamming owners is now Boras' best tactic, and it's worked in the past, so he's going to use it. I don't think DeWitt is going to fall for the pressure.
I'm with you. Current ownership has a pretty decent track record in getting deals done with this slimeball. Looks like DeWitt ignores the bluster and whining pretty well.
He does that pretty well when his own fans get upset.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21906
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

So, in simple terms, what do you do? Boras clearly isn't going to let Holliday sign a contract until the market is set by Bay (among others). So do you wait for Holliday, and risk missing out on Holliday and all of the other free agents, or do you start moving forward without Holliday.

IMO, it's a tough call for Mo, and I'm honestly not sure what my next move would be.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Jocephus »

According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Cardinals GM John Mozeliak met Thursday with Matt Holliday's agent, Scott Boras, but no offer was made.
"It was productive. We used our time well," Mozeliak said of the whole Winter Meetings experience. "We have a really good idea what the next step looks like." The Cardinals hope to come to a resolution with Holliday soon, one way or the other. They can't afford to wait around and let free agents sign elsewhere only to wind up Holliday-less and with many other holes come spring. The outfielder is thought to be seeking a contract well over $100M.
Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Jocephus wrote:
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Cardinals GM John Mozeliak met Thursday with Matt Holliday's agent, Scott Boras, but no offer was made.
"It was productive. We used our time well," Mozeliak said of the whole Winter Meetings experience. "We have a really good idea what the next step looks like." The Cardinals hope to come to a resolution with Holliday soon, one way or the other. They can't afford to wait around and let free agents sign elsewhere only to wind up Holliday-less and with many other holes come spring. The outfielder is thought to be seeking a contract well over $100M.
Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
If it's just money he wants, give him an 8/140 type deal. That's not insane.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Socnorb11 wrote:So, in simple terms, what do you do? Boras clearly isn't going to let Holliday sign a contract until the market is set by Bay (among others). So do you wait for Holliday, and risk missing out on Holliday and all of the other free agents, or do you start moving forward without Holliday.

IMO, it's a tough call for Mo, and I'm honestly not sure what my next move would be.
I don't know, but Mo did say they would make an offer and stick to it. At that point, it will be up to Holliday/Boras to move forward or move on. Should only take a day or so once the offer is made to know what direction to go. I don't think Mo wants to be the first to make the move though.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21906
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:So, in simple terms, what do you do? Boras clearly isn't going to let Holliday sign a contract until the market is set by Bay (among others). So do you wait for Holliday, and risk missing out on Holliday and all of the other free agents, or do you start moving forward without Holliday.

IMO, it's a tough call for Mo, and I'm honestly not sure what my next move would be.
I don't know, but Mo did say they would make an offer and stick to it. At that point, it will be up to Holliday/Boras to move forward or move on. Should only take a day or so once the offer is made to know what direction to go. I don't think Mo wants to be the first to make the move though.
I don't think Boras would consider ANY offer until after Bay signs, or the Yankees are out of the picture, or both.

User avatar
epinephrine
Veteran Player
Posts: 772
Joined: August 4 09, 9:24 pm
Location: 815, IL

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by epinephrine »

Socnorb11 wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:So, in simple terms, what do you do? Boras clearly isn't going to let Holliday sign a contract until the market is set by Bay (among others). So do you wait for Holliday, and risk missing out on Holliday and all of the other free agents, or do you start moving forward without Holliday.

IMO, it's a tough call for Mo, and I'm honestly not sure what my next move would be.
I don't know, but Mo did say they would make an offer and stick to it. At that point, it will be up to Holliday/Boras to move forward or move on. Should only take a day or so once the offer is made to know what direction to go. I don't think Mo wants to be the first to make the move though.
I don't think Boras would consider ANY offer until after Bay signs, or the Yankees are out of the picture, or both.
Unless it meets his demands of 23 million a year hah

planet planet
http://tinyurl.com/2e4x5hy
Posts: 24904
Joined: April 15 06, 6:25 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Update: The Matt Holliday Off-Season Thread

Post by planet planet »

I'm still confused as to why Bay needs to sign first. Doesn't the top player usually sign first which sets the market for everyone else? Is it strictly because of the Boras factor?

Locked