Regarding flexibility, I think that applies to everyone but the premier big $ reliever, who would be used in the most high pressure situations, whether closing or elsewhere. Think of how Andrew Miller was used in Cleveland and that's what I'd do for the best reliever.pioneer98 wrote: ↑July 26 23, 11:35 am
I agree with this approach but you have to be super flexible and not lock guys into roles (7th inning guy, 8th inning guy, 9th inning guy, etc). Or you have to be willing to shift these roles quickly. Because with this approach you will have a lot of question marks. With this approach you ride whoever is hot and quickly ditch whoever flops. This also means you need to have a lot of these arms since some will flop. Need the ability to stash some at AAA or the DL. But since the types of pitcher were are describing are cheap, cost is not a factor. Roster spots on the 40 man could be the issue though.
For everyone else, flexibility would be necessary.
Concerning the 40 man roster, you're probably right, but I'd also have every starter in Memphis be a starter as opposed to a swing reliever to further define a delineation between BP and starting. Also wouldn't be afraid to churn through relievers in Memphis or the bottom of the roster throughout the season until you find a guy who is consistently average or above average.


