Scheduled day off per WooSpider John wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:56 pmTaylor Motter at SS tonight, which makes me wonder if something going on with a DeJong trade.
Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Online
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
-
jagtrader
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12651
- Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
I think this trade deadline will reveal that teams don’t value the Cardinals’ players like they do. A K prone SS with no baserunning or on-base skill. A fringe CF with no power or speed. Pitchers with high walk rates or low K rates or both.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21907
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38624
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
"Scheduled day off" meaning "DeJong's day of rest" or "Motter's level of performance"?cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 27 23, 2:08 pmScheduled day off per WooSpider John wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:56 pmTaylor Motter at SS tonight, which makes me wonder if something going on with a DeJong trade.
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18092
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
If y'all don't think their trade chips are valuable, y'all can't also be mad if they don't get anything much back for them. Which is it?
- JoeMcKim
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 9248
- Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
- Location: South County, St. Louis
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
DeJong's scheduled day off and with Donovan not being to play the field and Edman on the IL basically Motter is the only other guy that can play SS.sighyoung wrote: ↑July 27 23, 2:52 pm"Scheduled day off" meaning "DeJong's day of rest" or "Motter's level of performance"?cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 27 23, 2:08 pmScheduled day off per WooSpider John wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:56 pmTaylor Motter at SS tonight, which makes me wonder if something going on with a DeJong trade.
-
dmarx114
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 25476
- Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
I am confused. We haven't extended anyone.MinorLeagueGuy wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:32 pmI think "cheap extensions", over "trade them, and hope they resign" is how I interpret this. Because in the event that they resign, it will be after other teams have driven the price a few million dollars north of what we potentially could've gotten them for on a team friendly extension.dmarx114 wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:19 pmHow did they do this?phins wrote: ↑July 27 23, 1:03 pmThere are times I say to myself, “well, at least the Cardinals can’t possibly handle things worse and are finally going to do a fast rebuild and sell.”
Then I read this thread and realize they really have become this antiquated and poorly run.
They’re killing their own trade returns for the off-chance they can save $5M or something.
Online
They’re valuable….flaherty, Monty, hicks, Stratton, dejong are valuable.
Even if they aren’t? You still trade them.
Monty is the only one you’d make a qualifying offer to, as the rest would accept (I’m afraid flaherty just might. and dejong has an option to decline)
So I’m not letting them walk for nothing.
Even if it’s crap; it’s better than getting absolutely nothing.
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
I’ve only seen 1 person talking about how we don’t think they’re valuableMagneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 27 23, 2:53 pmIf y'all don't think their trade chips are valuable, y'all can't also be mad if they don't get anything much back for them. Which is it?
They’re valuable….flaherty, Monty, hicks, Stratton, dejong are valuable.
Even if they aren’t? You still trade them.
Monty is the only one you’d make a qualifying offer to, as the rest would accept (I’m afraid flaherty just might. and dejong has an option to decline)
So I’m not letting them walk for nothing.
Even if it’s crap; it’s better than getting absolutely nothing.
Last edited by cardsfantx on July 27 23, 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
WAR God
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: August 2 22, 8:47 am
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
Agree. Can’t wait until Flaherty is off the club. Which is sad, because he had the makings of a Cardinals legend. Handsome kid, great stuff, moxie.cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 26 23, 5:55 pmAwwwwww
Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on the way out
K
Thx
Bye
Just became too toxic, plus the injuries, and lowered effectiveness. Sucks. But time to move on.
-
jagtrader
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12651
- Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am
Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild
For the rentals …Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 27 23, 2:53 pmIf y'all don't think their trade chips are valuable, y'all can't also be mad if they don't get anything much back for them. Which is it?
Not expecting blue chip prospects at all. Was hoping for some live arms for the bullpen and a Kutter Crawford kind of starter. Maybe two.
