I hear what you're saying and you make a reasonable point assuming that Craig can be a reasonable facsimile of Nady or a similar OF. I guess I'm just not convinced that he, with no ML ABs, is ready to provide more than replacement level production and while I agree with your earlier statement that Cameron, DeRosa or Beltre would be preferable to Nady all things being equal, I'm uncomfortable with the multi-season contracts that all three are likely to get.withAloe wrote:Nady's career UZR/150 in RF is -2.1 and his career UZR/150 in LF is 1.8. Not a big difference. In 2006, he had 512 PA and was worth .4 WAR. In 2007, he had 470 PA and was worth .8 WAR. Even if he's worth 1-2 WAR as a full-time LF, I don't see the point in signing him when we can get the same or better for the league minimum. And Nady is coming off of his second TJ surgery.Rieges wrote:Look a little deeper - Nady's WAR looks a lot better if he's a full-time LFer. With that said, I'm not opposed to a Craig/Church platoon over Nady but Church seems to have more value as a RFer.withAloe wrote:If we're talking about Nady as a starter, let's stop talking. 2008 aside, he's not even a 1-win player. If we're talking about having him be the backup corner outfielder and backup first baseman, I'd rather give that job to Craig or someone else from the minors.
As for Nady's value, my point was more that his lousy RF defense in '06 and '07 (-11.4 UZR/150 in '06, -7.6 in '07) obscured his two best offensive seasons aside from '08 in terms of his WAR ratings.


