Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18092
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Magneto2.0 »

MLB Media: "Dodgers and Cardinals are in serious talks about Arenado"
Fans: "Who are these sources?"
MLB Media: "Trust me, bro"

User avatar
JCShutout
MacGyver of Underwear
Posts: 13357
Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
Location: South City

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by JCShutout »

jagtrader wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:16 pm
It’s time to trade from the OF/MI surplus to get a legitimate starter who can give you 170 above average innings.
They did that last year.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by G. Keenan »

So are peeps buzzin' yet or nah?

Feeling like nah, but we've still got a few days before the deadline.

Slider
All-Star
Posts: 1645
Joined: July 23 08, 2:36 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Slider »

I don’t believe at all that Nolan gets traded. However, if I am wrong; wouldn’t that mean that Goldy would be traded as well? Either at the deadline or the off season? Commit Gorman to 3rd and Walker to first. Keep O’Neil and Carlson? Use Nolan/Goldy to load up on pitching?

WAR God
Veteran Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: August 2 22, 8:47 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by WAR God »

I’m just really happy that the team wont trade Gorman.

He’s a stud. G Keenan was pro Gorman even when he was getting tossed into trades for Soto etc

WAR God
Veteran Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: August 2 22, 8:47 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by WAR God »

Also, Goldschmidt’s value should be huge. I was looking at his peripherals. He’s hitting the ball as hard as he ever has. Not doing quite as well against fastballs, but he’s destroying offspeed stuff. He’s easily the best bat available at the deadline.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12651
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by jagtrader »

JCShutout wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:34 pm
jagtrader wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:16 pm
It’s time to trade from the OF/MI surplus to get a legitimate starter who can give you 170 above average innings.
They did that last year.
Yes. This time involving players with longer team control.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12085
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by phins »

MinorLeagueGuy wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:32 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:19 pm
phins wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:03 pm
There are times I say to myself, “well, at least the Cardinals can’t possibly handle things worse and are finally going to do a fast rebuild and sell.”

Then I read this thread and realize they really have become this antiquated and poorly run.

They’re killing their own trade returns for the off-chance they can save $5M or something.
How did they do this?
I think "cheap extensions", over "trade them, and hope they resign" is how I interpret this. Because in the event that they resign, it will be after other teams have driven the price a few million dollars north of what we potentially could've gotten them for on a team friendly extension.
++

The only upside to talking extensions and holding until last minute is the hope the deadline pressure gets them to accept a deal for slightly below market etc.

Otherwise, there is nothing stopping them from making actual moves now and then just re-signing whomever they want to a market deal in the winter anyway (including the players they trade).

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by haltz »

phins wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:53 pm
MinorLeagueGuy wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:32 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:19 pm
phins wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:03 pm
There are times I say to myself, “well, at least the Cardinals can’t possibly handle things worse and are finally going to do a fast rebuild and sell.”

Then I read this thread and realize they really have become this antiquated and poorly run.

They’re killing their own trade returns for the off-chance they can save $5M or something.
How did they do this?
I think "cheap extensions", over "trade them, and hope they resign" is how I interpret this. Because in the event that they resign, it will be after other teams have driven the price a few million dollars north of what we potentially could've gotten them for on a team friendly extension.
++

The only upside to talking extensions and holding until last minute is the hope the deadline pressure gets them to accept a deal for slightly below market etc.

Otherwise, there is nothing stopping them from making actual moves now and then just re-signing whomever they want to a market deal in the winter anyway (including the players they trade).
According to Denton there was some traction on this front with Flaherty as opposed to Monty who has been dead set on testing the market since the regular season began and will get top value and nothing else.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12085
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by phins »

haltz wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:55 pm
phins wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 3:53 pm
MinorLeagueGuy wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:32 pm
dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:19 pm
phins wrote: ↑
July 27 23, 1:03 pm
There are times I say to myself, “well, at least the Cardinals can’t possibly handle things worse and are finally going to do a fast rebuild and sell.”

Then I read this thread and realize they really have become this antiquated and poorly run.

They’re killing their own trade returns for the off-chance they can save $5M or something.
How did they do this?
I think "cheap extensions", over "trade them, and hope they resign" is how I interpret this. Because in the event that they resign, it will be after other teams have driven the price a few million dollars north of what we potentially could've gotten them for on a team friendly extension.
++

The only upside to talking extensions and holding until last minute is the hope the deadline pressure gets them to accept a deal for slightly below market etc.

Otherwise, there is nothing stopping them from making actual moves now and then just re-signing whomever they want to a market deal in the winter anyway (including the players they trade).
According to Denton there was some traction on this front with Flaherty as opposed to Monty who has been dead set on testing the market since the regular season began and will get top value and nothing else.
But why? Flaherty can be traded now and re-signed in the winter for the same deal (unless you're going back to my original comment about trying to save a little money).

Post Reply