LOLMichael wrote:skmsw = Boras
EDIT: LOL nervously.
LOLMichael wrote:skmsw = Boras
LOLOLMichael wrote:Steve = Borasskmsw wrote: I'm just playing boogeyman.
Their payroll was 70 mil last year, their GM is just an idiot.Michael wrote:Being the poor kid in the neighborhood stinks. I can't imagine how Royals fans feel.
JoeStrauss @PitViper83 this isn't the "bomb"
Just occurred to me that both Damon & Holliday are Boras clients; with them playing the same position, an interesting potential conflict of interest could be in play as far as signing wth the Yankees.TimeForGuinness wrote:Ideally this will play out as:
Yankees - Damon
Mets - Bay
Cards - Holliday
Well you probably don't get Matt Holliday in years 6-8.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I am sure you have statistical evidence to back that claim up, and I don't. But, there's no way I'd rather see the Marlon Byrd/Kelly Johnson/Ben Sheets of the world for the next 8 years (even in years 6-8) than Matt Holliday.
Me too. I'll be giddy if he re-signs, pretty much regardless. Even if I think they might regret it later.3. Pujols
4. Holliday
for the next however many years makes me excited.
I think that signing Holliday would signify that ownership has decided to mortgage the latter parts of the coming decade in order to take advantage of prime years of the core the team currently has. Pujols is about to hit his 30s and players like Carpenter and Wainwright aren't getting any younger. If you're going to win with this core, it's going to be the next couple of seasons. If you're not going to try winning with this core, then why even bother retaining them?haltz wrote: Me too. I'll be giddy if he re-signs, pretty much regardless. Even if I think they might regret it later.