THE TM & TFG SUPER HAPPY FUN THREAD!!!!!!!!1111111111

cardinalkarp · Post by **cardinalkarp** » July 5 06, 4:14 pm

docellis wrote:overheard this weekend:

"back when terrorists first got together, it was about 1930, in Isreal, they figured out how to deal with them. see, they took about 50 of them and they poured pigs blood all over them, because they hate that, and they send the photo of them in pigs blood to their friends.

wasn't no more terrorism for 50 years after that."

:roll:

You over hear some strange things doc, where have you been haning out??

docellis · Post by **docellis** » July 5 06, 4:50 pm

cardinalkarp wrote:
docellis wrote:overheard this weekend:

"back when terrorists first got together, it was about 1930, in Isreal, they figured out how to deal with them. see, they took about 50 of them and they poured pigs blood all over them, because they hate that, and they send the photo of them in pigs blood to their friends.

wasn't no more terrorism for 50 years after that."

:roll:
You over hear some strange things doc, where have you been haning out??

I wanted so bad to turn to this person and say, "Oh Isreal in the 1930's was quite a time in Isreali history!"

Because the British white paper didn't even exist until like 1939, much less the actual state of Isreal. And the term "terrorism"?? I don't even think that term was ever used until what, the 70s or 80s?

I mean, I am not a history buff but when someone starts out a sentence with "when the terrorists first got together in Isreal back in the 30's"??

Or am I way off base?

cardinalkarp · Post by **cardinalkarp** » July 5 06, 5:04 pm

I haven't heard of much terrorism back in the 1930's or at least anything that was referred to as a terroist act.

docellis · Post by **docellis** » July 5 06, 5:06 pm

cardinalkarp wrote:I haven't heard of much terrorism back in the 1930's or at least anything that was referred to as a terroist act.

well throw some pigs blood on it and all of a sudden it couldn't be ignored.

cardinalkarp · Post by **cardinalkarp** » July 5 06, 5:08 pm

docellis wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:I haven't heard of much terrorism back in the 1930's or at least anything that was referred to as a terroist act.
well throw some pigs blood on it and all of a sudden it couldn't be ignored.

We're straying very far away from the title of this thread.

docellis · Post by **docellis** » July 5 06, 5:09 pm

cardinalkarp wrote:
docellis wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:I haven't heard of much terrorism back in the 1930's or at least anything that was referred to as a terroist act.
well throw some pigs blood on it and all of a sudden it couldn't be ignored.

We're straying very far away from the title of this thread.

You're right.

cardinalkarp · Post by **cardinalkarp** » July 5 06, 5:14 pm

docellis wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:
docellis wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:I haven't heard of much terrorism back in the 1930's or at least anything that was referred to as a terroist act.
well throw some pigs blood on it and all of a sudden it couldn't be ignored.

We're straying very far away from the title of this thread.
You're right.

much better

Grammar_Police · Post by **Grammar_Police** » July 5 06, 5:20 pm

http://www.leekspin.com/