Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by haltz »

I'm guessing that if there were conversations the Cards balked at the price because their comparable players are more advanced than Manzardo and too much to pay for Civale.

User avatar
MinorLeagueGuy
The Angst is Real
Posts: 18456
Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by MinorLeagueGuy »

haltz wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 2:15 pm
I'm guessing that if there were conversations the Cards balked at the price because their comparable players are more advanced than Manzardo and too much to pay for Civale.
This is what I was trying to articulate.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12627
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by jagtrader »

Cardinals need a Civale like they need a Mikolas in the head.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12078
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by phins »

dmarx114 wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 12:31 pm
phins wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 11:41 am
jagtrader wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 11:00 am
Popeye_Card wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 10:45 am
phins wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 10:18 am


100
This season is at least opening up clear spots in the rotation and bullpen that need to be filled, without Mo just saying “well we already have too many pitchers for those spots, so we need to see what we have first”. We all had a pretty strong hunch as to what we had.
60 percent of the starting five had been in the rotation off and on since 2018. One can’t overstate how stuck in the mud the Cardinals were.
It feels like they were going to roll with the way things were until it was clear it would no longer work. You can't really hate the approach too much, since fans give grief when a team moves away from something they have had success with in the past.

The part that continues to stand out to me in all of these articles is the assertion that "we looked into how pitch shape worked into missing bats. We studied how pitch to contact has been less effective without the shift. Prioritized pitchers who had swing-and-miss stuff etc."

This revolution on pitch shape, sweepers, release angle, "funky" relievers, deployment of starters, bullpen architecture etc. has been en vogue for at least five years now. Why are the Cardinals as an org. just now talking about these things?
Cause we no longer have an insanely good defense like we did 2 years ago, and the shift has been banned.

If you're going to roll with Jordan Walker and Nolan Gorman every day, you better minimize their defensive chances.
You can- and should have- been doing both.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24261
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?

User avatar
GeddyWrox
Caught you a delicious bass
Posts: 14663
Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by GeddyWrox »

Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:02 pm
Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?
I am really starting to wonder this too.

If he is, they're going to have a lot of spending to do come FA season.

User avatar
TGantz
R-E-S-P-E-C-T...What Dr Pepper Means to Me
Posts: 6698
Joined: July 27 06, 11:59 pm
Location: The Lou

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by TGantz »

Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:02 pm
Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?
I would think they would trade Flaherty.

After looking at SP FA market, part of me thinks its not the worst idea to extend Flaherty. If we lose out on Snell, Montgomery, and Nola, which past history indicates we will, Flaherty would have some of the highest potential on the FA market. Maybe we can add a Severino type and hope it works out. I really hate to gamble on the rotation again, but we're also much closer to Graceffo and Kloppenstein (or however you spell it) being able to contribute if a SP starts tanking. And Liberatore might turn some stuff around this season.

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Lesson »

GeddyWrox wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:16 pm
Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:02 pm
Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?
I am really starting to wonder this too.

If he is, they're going to have a lot of spending to do come FA season.
Not necessarily if they go through the trade market for a pitching upgrade in the off-season.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18089
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Magneto2.0 »

Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:02 pm
Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?
There's still a full day to go. I'd be shocked if he's done. I think Flaherty, Dejong are going for sure. I wouldn't be surprised if Carlson is gone too.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

They don’t have to trade for next year’s starter now, but they don’t have to wait either. I kinda hope they get that piece that fits into 2024 tomorrow.

Post Reply