Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12078
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by phins »

I wonder if the plan is to QO Flaherty and hope he accepts?

Slider
All-Star
Posts: 1643
Joined: July 23 08, 2:36 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Slider »

phins wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:37 pm
I wonder if the plan is to QO Flaherty and hope he accepts?
Would be shocked. MO has already said a trade piece is more valuable than a QO pick.

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Lesson »

MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:31 pm
They don’t have to trade for next year’s starter now, but they don’t have to wait either. I kinda hope they get that piece that fits into 2024 tomorrow.
Why pay a higher premium in player capital tomorrow when you can get the same pitcher for less via trade in the off-season?

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Lesson wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:59 pm
MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:31 pm
They don’t have to trade for next year’s starter now, but they don’t have to wait either. I kinda hope they get that piece that fits into 2024 tomorrow.
Why pay a higher premium in player capital tomorrow when you can get the same pitcher for less via trade in the off-season?
This is going to be an arbitrage.

Spider John
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 10951
Joined: May 18 06, 10:09 pm
Location: East of the middle of West Tennessee

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Spider John »

GeddyWrox wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:16 pm
Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:02 pm
Peeps don't seem to be buzzing - is Mo done?
I am really starting to wonder this too.

If he is, they're going to have a lot of spending to do come FA season.
That's the way it's been in the past. Make a deal or two, stop short, and then spend the rest of the offseason patting each other on the back for half a job well done.
Last edited by Spider John on July 31 23, 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12627
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by jagtrader »

They have to trade Flaherty. I’ve wondered all along if they have the stomach to trade anyone they can keep beyond this season.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by haltz »

MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 5:03 pm
Lesson wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:59 pm
MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:31 pm
They don’t have to trade for next year’s starter now, but they don’t have to wait either. I kinda hope they get that piece that fits into 2024 tomorrow.
Why pay a higher premium in player capital tomorrow when you can get the same pitcher for less via trade in the off-season?
This is going to be an arbitrage.
Right, and Mo has said they need to fill a spot before the offseason. Acquiring three pitchers at once is a huge ask even if the money wasn't an issue and of course it will be.

They've got 24 hours and I can't imagine they're done.
Last edited by haltz on July 31 23, 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JCShutout
MacGyver of Underwear
Posts: 13352
Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
Location: South City

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by JCShutout »

I think the cardinals are in a decent spot. Pdj should be moved because contenders need bats and we have a surplus, but worst case he picks up the option and moves him later. (Probably best likely value nowish though?)

Sorta same with Jack. Worst case is the qo pick or a one year qo prove it deal for him at what, basically waino’s salary iirc, in a year when we need lots of starters. One could do much worse than Jack.

I’d like to see them both traded, but I think they can wait until they get a deal they like.

dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25464
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by dmarx114 »

Flaherty is being traded. Have some patience.

dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25464
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by dmarx114 »

Lesson wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:59 pm
MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 31 23, 4:31 pm
They don’t have to trade for next year’s starter now, but they don’t have to wait either. I kinda hope they get that piece that fits into 2024 tomorrow.
Why pay a higher premium in player capital tomorrow when you can get the same pitcher for less via trade in the off-season?
Yup, this.

Post Reply