How important is it to win during spring training?
Posted: February 28 07, 6:00 pm
I was looking at the Cardinals Game Notes for the Florida game and I noticed there was a listing of their recent spring training records. Now I've always labored under the impression that spring training records are irrelevant to a team's pending success or lack thereof. In fact, I've noticed over the years that many times the better teams seem to have some of the worst records in spring training.
I've guessed that this may be due, somewhat, to those better teams already having a somewhat established roster and spring training for those particular teams is used more for an audition for their new prospects. For whatever reason, the best teams do not always rise to the top during spring training.
After looking at the recent records of the Cardinals in spring training, however, it makes me wonder if there may be some correlation between spring training records and how a team ultimately performs during the regular season.
Spring Training Records..............Actual Season Records
2006 15-14 (.517)......................2006 83-79 (.516)
2005 15-11 (.577)......................2005 100-62 (.617)
2004 17-12 (.586)......................2004 105-57 (.648)
2003 12-15 (.444)......................2003 85-77 (.525)
2002 17-10 (.629)......................2002 97-65 (.599)
2001 17-15 (.531)......................2001 93-69 (.574)
2000 17-11 (.607)......................2000 95-67 (.586)
2003 was the only year our spring training record was under .500 and, subsequently, the only year since 2000 that we missed the playoffs.
Now I'm not actually contending that there is a strong correlation between the two but I'm curious if anyone thinks that there is anything to learn from spring training records and how a team eventually will perform. Are the numbers above simply a coincidence? I found it interesting that the spring training winning percentage somewhat mirrored the actual season winning percentage.
I've guessed that this may be due, somewhat, to those better teams already having a somewhat established roster and spring training for those particular teams is used more for an audition for their new prospects. For whatever reason, the best teams do not always rise to the top during spring training.
After looking at the recent records of the Cardinals in spring training, however, it makes me wonder if there may be some correlation between spring training records and how a team ultimately performs during the regular season.
Spring Training Records..............Actual Season Records
2006 15-14 (.517)......................2006 83-79 (.516)
2005 15-11 (.577)......................2005 100-62 (.617)
2004 17-12 (.586)......................2004 105-57 (.648)
2003 12-15 (.444)......................2003 85-77 (.525)
2002 17-10 (.629)......................2002 97-65 (.599)
2001 17-15 (.531)......................2001 93-69 (.574)
2000 17-11 (.607)......................2000 95-67 (.586)
2003 was the only year our spring training record was under .500 and, subsequently, the only year since 2000 that we missed the playoffs.
Now I'm not actually contending that there is a strong correlation between the two but I'm curious if anyone thinks that there is anything to learn from spring training records and how a team eventually will perform. Are the numbers above simply a coincidence? I found it interesting that the spring training winning percentage somewhat mirrored the actual season winning percentage.